'Slapper' Batter/Runner interference question

[greymule]

sight the rule before you can cite it, and the situation has a site

Clever. A+

[robbie]

that makes more sense. I think my issue is that being stuck by a thrown ball in reference to 8.2.F.3 would be interference. Especially now with taking out 'intent' in interference.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oakla:

I think this is the problem:

Above you say "being struck by a thrown ball.... would be interference."

Thats NOT what the rule says. The rule says batter is out if he interferes with a thrown ball. He did not interfere, he was hit. Two different things.

[Dakota]

Originally Posted by greymule

sight the rule before you can cite it, and the situation has a site

Clever. A+

Thanks, greymule!