![]() |
|
|||
|
Quote:
"This could be ruled a false start if the covering official(s) determine that it was designed to cause B to encroach" If it was "what the FED wanted", this case play would simply say False Start. The qualifier is because it is the MOVEMENT that matters. IF officials determine the MOVEMENT (sharp, abrupt, startling, whatever) is designed to draw the defense offsides, it's a false start. Simply running a play with no intent to snap the ball is NOT a false start, and you'd be drummed out of any association for calling it as such.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WR - false start vs. illegal motion vs. illegal shift | stegenref | Football | 25 | Sat Oct 02, 2010 09:21pm |
| illegal shift or illegal motion | verticalStripes | Football | 20 | Wed Oct 01, 2008 12:34pm |
| Mixed Interp: Illegal Motion / Shift | ljudge | Football | 7 | Mon Nov 14, 2005 11:12am |
| Motion, shift or nothing | schwinn | Football | 20 | Wed Nov 02, 2005 02:20pm |
| Illegal Motion or Illegal Shift | Simbio | Football | 11 | Fri Oct 31, 2003 08:50pm |