Illegal motion or shift?

[Robert Goodman]

Originally Posted by Canned Heat

I'd be willing to bet the NFHS/FED wishes they could've rescinded the wording on this one...talk about a can of worms.

What do you mean, wishes they could've? They get a chance every year. Fed used to be very reasonable, now maybe they've gotten arrogant and don't want to admit they made a mistake when they broadened this years ago. It used to be just as open-ended but with more of a presumption of legality: "...any act clearly intended to cause an opponent to commit a foul." Now IIRC the reworded passage is missing the word "clearly".