The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 10, 2010, 10:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally Posted by Official View Post
Ok I know I've got to be over thinking this. Help me out please.

Offensive players cannot move once they put their hands on the ground they are "married" to the ground.
Once an interior linemen places his hand on or near the ground, he can't lift it.

Quote:
If a player is in motion at the snap he must be 5 yards behind the LOS.
No. If he's not a back and goes in motion, he must be at least 5 yards behind to LOS.

Quote:
A player may not move perpendicular to the LOS (Wouldn't this be a false start and not IM though? How could you not blow a movement toward the LOS dead?
He can't be moving toward the LOS when the ball is snapped.

Quote:
If a player in the backfield is set and shuffles a little to the left/right is this act legal?
Yes.

Quote:
Is a player set if they are standing motionless and picking their nose?
There's no requirement that the player be motionless. He just has to be set and not making any movement that simulates action at the snap.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 10, 2010, 10:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 60
thanks I truly appreciate it.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 11, 2010, 11:08am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,909
Quote:
Originally Posted by BktBallRef View Post
If he's not a back and goes in motion, he must be at least 5 yards behind to LOS.
I think you have to substitute the word "is" for "goes" above. Consider a player who's set just barely in the backfield and goes in motion parallel to the LOS. Suppose that at the snap the closest OL to him has body parts closer to his team's end line than some of his own body parts. He may have been a back when he went in motion, but by getting near that player is no longer a back.

But I doubt any of you would give any more than a warning on this one. Seems if the player is already well along his way in motion, he's not going to confuse the defense as to whether he's on the line or in the backfield, so I think the spirit of the rule is served without att'n to that detail.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 11, 2010, 11:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goodman View Post
I think you have to substitute the word "is" for "goes" above. Consider a player who's set just barely in the backfield and goes in motion parallel to the LOS. Suppose that at the snap the closest OL to him has body parts closer to his team's end line than some of his own body parts. He may have been a back when he went in motion, but by getting near that player is no longer a back.
That's not what the rule says. Here's (most of) 7-2-7:

Except for the player “under
the snapper,” as outlined in Article 3, the player in motion shall be at least 5 yards
behind his line of scrimmage at the snap if he started from any position not clearly
behind the line and did not establish himself as a back by stopping for at least
one full second while no part of his body is breaking the vertical plane through
the waistline of his nearest teammate who is on the line of scrimmage.

Nothing in the rules supports the imaginary idea that a back can lose his status as a back by going in motion. And if he's moving toward the NZ at the snap, he's still a back but the motion is illegal.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 11, 2010, 09:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,909
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
That's not what the rule says. Here's (most of) 7-2-7:

Except for the player “under
the snapper,” as outlined in Article 3, the player in motion shall be at least 5 yards
behind his line of scrimmage at the snap if he started from any position not clearly
behind the line and did not establish himself as a back by stopping for at least
one full second while no part of his body is breaking the vertical plane through
the waistline of his nearest teammate who is on the line of scrimmage.

Nothing in the rules supports the imaginary idea that a back can lose his status as a back by going in motion. And if he's moving toward the NZ at the snap, he's still a back but the motion is illegal.
Look at the definition of "offensive back" and tell me a player's status can't change depending on which teammate on the line of scrimmage he's closest to. Now tell me why if he's in motion he couldn't be closest to A1 when he started and A2 later.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 16, 2010, 01:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 60
Quote:
Originally Posted by BktBallRef View Post
There's no requirement that the player be motionless. He just has to be set and not making any movement that simulates action at the snap.
I found this...

After a huddle or shift all 11 players of A shall come to an absolute stop and shall remain stationary simultaneously without movement of hands, feet, head, or body for at least one second before the snap (7-2-6).
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 17, 2010, 05:30pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 60
bump
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 18, 2010, 07:39am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,153
Quote:
After a huddle or shift all 11 players of A shall come to an absolute stop and shall remain stationary simultaneously without movement of hands, feet, head, or body for at least one second before the snap (7-2-6).
You really think guys should call this as it is written?

No one calls it that way! LOL!!

I agree with you 100% BTW!
__________________
When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my azz!
Bobby Knight
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 18, 2010, 09:27am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjohn View Post
You really think guys should call this as it is written?

No one calls it that way! LOL!!

I agree with you 100% BTW!
Never worked in Ohio, but in Indiana, New Jersey both Upstate and Downstate NY, that's the way it's allways called.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WR - false start vs. illegal motion vs. illegal shift stegenref Football 25 Sat Oct 02, 2010 09:21pm
illegal shift or illegal motion verticalStripes Football 20 Wed Oct 01, 2008 12:34pm
Mixed Interp: Illegal Motion / Shift ljudge Football 7 Mon Nov 14, 2005 11:12am
Motion, shift or nothing schwinn Football 20 Wed Nov 02, 2005 02:20pm
Illegal Motion or Illegal Shift Simbio Football 11 Fri Oct 31, 2003 08:50pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1