The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 02, 2009, 08:24am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goodman View Post
I got into a long argument with Scott Taylor about my "zeroth down" proposal for repeat-the-down penalties following CoP because we disagree over whether that or the current penalty administration comes closest to setting back the conditions to when the foul occurred.
Ah, Scott Taylor. That brings back memories. As Scott passed away about 3 years ago, you won't be having that argument with him again. It was entertaining, though, as was Scott over on alt.sport.officiating (and when it all moved to rec.sport.officiating).
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 02, 2009, 08:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,593
There's a really simple remedy that totally eliminates any, and all, problems with this enforcement; don't commit defensive fouls on a down following a FC.

The current rule gives R a choice of putting the ball in play by snap, or free kick. B makes that choice based, partially, on field position. 99+% of the time B is going to choose putting the ball in play by snap. They run a play, during which they don't do anything wrong and because of some error on the part of the defense, are allowed to REPEAT the down.

Why should they lose the choice they had EARNED by making a Fair Catch? Of course, you might consider this happens, "once in a blue moon" adding a rare level of strategy for those who have taken the time to learn the rules of the game.

As for "harmonizing" the rules. If you want Canadian Football, I'm sure our neighbors to the North would welcome your visit, or if you want NCAA rules there are 2 States and countless colleges that will satisfy your needs. We also have NFL games in cities across the nation at your disposal.

Football rules began at the collegiate level and over the years have modified in one direction to accomodate younger athletes, and the other direction to accomodate adults. Both accomodations make sense for their respective audiences. Coaches should focus on the level they coach, not where they might have played, or watch on TV.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 02, 2009, 12:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,920
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajmc View Post
There's a really simple remedy that totally eliminates any, and all, problems with this enforcement; don't commit defensive fouls on a down following a FC.
Duh, there's an even simpler remedy: Don't play football.

Quote:
As for "harmonizing" the rules. If you want Canadian Football, I'm sure our neighbors to the North would welcome your visit, or if you want NCAA rules there are 2 States and countless colleges that will satisfy your needs. We also have NFL games in cities across the nation at your disposal.

Football rules began at the collegiate level and over the years have modified in one direction to accomodate younger athletes, and the other direction to accomodate adults. Both accomodations make sense for their respective audiences. Coaches should focus on the level they coach, not where they might have played, or watch on TV.
I hope you understand that the harmoniz'n process I described involved consolidating the rules for the different types of free kicks and reducing their idiosyncracies within one code, not between codes.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 02, 2009, 12:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,920
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
Ah, Scott Taylor. That brings back memories. As Scott passed away about 3 years ago, you won't be having that argument with him again.
Last I'd heard, his diabetes was well managed, things seemed OK. What got him?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 03, 2009, 01:05am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goodman View Post
Last I'd heard, his diabetes was well managed, things seemed OK. What got him?
The big C, from what I heard, late in 2006. "The late Scott Taylor" is credited in the NFHS Redding Guide.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 03, 2009, 01:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,920
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
The big C, from what I heard, late in 2006. "The late Scott Taylor" is credited in the NFHS Redding Guide.
Wow, cancer of what?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 03, 2009, 11:20pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goodman View Post
Wow, cancer of what?
I don't know. We weren't friends (I never met him), just Usenet acquaintances. I do remember asking him about a long absence and remember him saying "cancer sucks". I could very well be wrong as to the cause.

We sparred quite vigorously and went round and round and I miss that.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Free kick following a fair catch ljdave Football 13 Wed Oct 15, 2008 02:05pm
Free Kick after a Fair Catch CWIG Football 9 Wed Jul 30, 2008 01:53pm
Free Kick after a Fair Catch gtwbam Football 5 Sun Oct 08, 2006 01:58am
Free Kick After Fair Catch Simbio Football 15 Mon Oct 13, 2003 06:03pm
Free Kick After Fair-Catch Warrenkicker Football 8 Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:10pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1