![]() |
|
|
|||
anyone that looks at that clip and doesn't think the kid led with his head should retire.
it doesn't say a thing about first in this description of butt blocking. Butt Blocking in 1 and 2 and face tackling in 3 are both tactics which involve driving the face mask, frontal area or top of the helmet directly into an opponent in blocking or tackling respectively. both result in a foul for illegal helmet contact Last edited by bigjohn; Mon Jul 27, 2009 at 03:26pm. |
|
|||
John,
the problem is NOT that many officials here fail to acknowledge what is IHC and the importance of calling it. We are all pretty much in agreement on that. What is the problem is the videos you've submitted do NOT meet that standard in our eyes. We get it that in your eyes it's clear. But from our view, it must be a clear no doubt about it foul. The contact must be initiated by the helmet. Not that he simply drops his head, not what we think he intended to do, not what probably happened. It's what we can clearly, and that's CLEARLY, see. Perhaps you might consider since you are in the very small minority here that the problem is not what we are failing to see but what you are imagining to see.
__________________
Indecision may or may not be my problem Last edited by Mike L; Mon Jul 27, 2009 at 03:32pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
It's not that difficult.
__________________
Cheers, mb |
|
|||
This is directly from the S&I guide.
Butt Blocking in 1 and 2 and face tackling in 3 are both tactics which involve driving the face mask, frontal area or top of the helmet directly into an opponent in blocking or tackling respectively. both result in a foul for illegal helmet contact So you are saying casebook trumps S&I? |
|
|||
and no flag, walt, Nuttin?
in the one I posted Walt the blocker leads with the head, and the initial contact is with the helmet. How is it not IHC? You guys are not serious are you? Last edited by bigjohn; Mon Jul 27, 2009 at 08:47pm. |
|
|||
First, thanks to BigJohn for posting the links. It is just these types of close calls and the discussion about them that is helpful about this and other sites.
However, it seems that all too often when folks disagree the discussion breaks down to personal assualts and childish criticisms. I don't get it. That is the sole reason I don't go on NFHS much. Takes the fun out of it. That being said, I think the first two plays involved clean blocks and I would have a foul for face tackling in the third. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Block | surehands | Football | 11 | Thu Sep 04, 2008 02:46pm |
The good old Block/Charge and when to not call it | Tweet | Basketball | 24 | Wed Nov 30, 2005 03:32pm |
Block or not? | Sven | Basketball | 4 | Sat Mar 19, 2005 11:17pm |
difference between cut block and chop block | ase | Football | 7 | Mon Nov 29, 2004 11:23am |
block, then a block? | lrpalmer3 | Basketball | 10 | Thu May 20, 2004 01:18am |