The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 27, 2009, 02:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,305
Perhaps this is a case of YOU seeing what YOU want tosee cause there are others who do NOT see that action here
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 27, 2009, 02:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Warren, Ohio
Posts: 254
Send a message via Yahoo to umpirebob71
Guys, he does this nonsense on other forums, as well. Whines and cries like a six year-old child when it doen't get its way. Your act is getting old, bigjohn. Time to retire it.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 27, 2009, 03:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,153
anyone that looks at that clip and doesn't think the kid led with his head should retire.

it doesn't say a thing about first in this description of butt blocking.

Butt Blocking in 1 and 2 and face tackling in 3 are both tactics which involve driving the face mask, frontal area or top of the helmet directly into an opponent in blocking or tackling respectively. both result in a foul for illegal helmet contact

Last edited by bigjohn; Mon Jul 27, 2009 at 03:26pm.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 27, 2009, 03:30pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 566
John,
the problem is NOT that many officials here fail to acknowledge what is IHC and the importance of calling it. We are all pretty much in agreement on that.
What is the problem is the videos you've submitted do NOT meet that standard in our eyes. We get it that in your eyes it's clear. But from our view, it must be a clear no doubt about it foul. The contact must be initiated by the helmet. Not that he simply drops his head, not what we think he intended to do, not what probably happened. It's what we can clearly, and that's CLEARLY, see.
Perhaps you might consider since you are in the very small minority here that the problem is not what we are failing to see but what you are imagining to see.
__________________
Indecision may or may not be my problem

Last edited by Mike L; Mon Jul 27, 2009 at 03:32pm.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 27, 2009, 04:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjohn View Post
it doesn't say a thing about first in this description of butt blocking.
You're not interpreting the definition of IHC correctly, as everyone else has said.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2009 NFHS Football Case Book
2.20.1 SITUATION A: From a four-point stance on the offensive line, interior
lineman A1: (a) initially contacts an opponent by driving his face mask directly
into the opponent’s chest who is not the ball carrier; or (b) contacts an opponent
with his shoulder so that his head is to the side of the opponent’s body and the
helmet does not make initial contact
; or (c) attempts to block an opponent with a
shoulder, but because of a defensive slant, primary contact with the opponent is
made with A1’s helmet. RULING: The block in (a) is illegal butt blocking. In (b),
even though there was some contact with the helmet, the block is legal because
the helmet or face mask was not used to deliver the blow
. In (c), the covering official
will have to judge whether or not it is a foul. Because of defensive slants and
stunts, there will be instances in which the blocker attempts to make a legal
shoulder block, but inadvertently contacts an opponent with either his face mask
or helmet. When this is the case, contact does not result in a direct blow and is
legal. (9-4-3i)
In the clip you posted, everyone else seems to agree that the initial contact was not with the helmet. Thus, no foul.

It's not that difficult.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 27, 2009, 04:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,153
This is directly from the S&I guide.

Butt Blocking in 1 and 2 and face tackling in 3 are both tactics which involve driving the face mask, frontal area or top of the helmet directly into an opponent in blocking or tackling respectively. both result in a foul for illegal helmet contact


So you are saying casebook trumps S&I?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 27, 2009, 07:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjohn View Post
So you are saying casebook trumps S&I?
Absolutely.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 27, 2009, 08:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,153
and no flag, walt, Nuttin?

in the one I posted Walt the blocker leads with the head, and the initial contact is with the helmet. How is it not IHC?

You guys are not serious are you?

Last edited by bigjohn; Mon Jul 27, 2009 at 08:47pm.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 27, 2009, 04:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 508
First, thanks to BigJohn for posting the links. It is just these types of close calls and the discussion about them that is helpful about this and other sites.

However, it seems that all too often when folks disagree the discussion breaks down to personal assualts and childish criticisms. I don't get it. That is the sole reason I don't go on NFHS much. Takes the fun out of it.

That being said, I think the first two plays involved clean blocks and I would have a foul for face tackling in the third.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Block surehands Football 11 Thu Sep 04, 2008 02:46pm
The good old Block/Charge and when to not call it Tweet Basketball 24 Wed Nov 30, 2005 03:32pm
Block or not? Sven Basketball 4 Sat Mar 19, 2005 11:17pm
difference between cut block and chop block ase Football 7 Mon Nov 29, 2004 11:23am
block, then a block? lrpalmer3 Basketball 10 Thu May 20, 2004 01:18am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:31am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1