NFHS Survey up

[ajmc]

The offense has earned the opportunity to "try" for a bonus point. The defense has earned nothing, but is given a fair opportunity to prevent the offense from earning their bonus.

Why would you want to reward the defense for allowing their opponent to score a TD?

[TXMike]

The NCAA rule was changed in 1988 as there was thought that the extra point was too much in favor of the offense and the change was needed to restore some balance. They also hoped to reduce the number of PAT kicks. They achieved the 1st goal but did not do much on the 2d.

[KurtBryan]

Dear Officials:

Two great pieces coming out this month: a) ESPN Magazine - should be a great piece,

and b) the NY Times called today, and the A-11 Offense will be featured as one of great inventions in the Country in 2008 in their annual issue.

* That is great news for: the kids, the coaches, the Refs, the fans and the NFHS and CIF...plus all of the other teams, coaches, players and states who ramped up the A-11 in 2008.

[JRutledge]

I guess if you call an invention that cannot be used the following year great.

Peace

[TXMike]

This will the 8th installment of the series by the NY Times Magazine

Interesting disclaimer from last year's list:


"They're not the best, not all the most promising .... They're not even the most popular. The ideas are not necessarily good ideas."

And an example of some of the great ideas from last year's list:

Lap dancers get better tips when they are ovulating.

You are in great company there KB!

[Robert Goodman]

Originally Posted by TXMike

The NCAA rule was changed in 1988 as there was thought that the extra point was too much in favor of the offense and the change was needed to restore some balance. They also hoped to reduce the number of PAT kicks. They achieved the 1st goal but did not do much on the 2d.

The solution was so simple (abolishing the try outright) they couldn't see it.

Darn, I should've multi-quoted. But at least now the thread won't be so dominated by A-11 discussion.

Robert