Video Request - Syracuse vs Duke (Video)

[VaTerp]

Originally Posted by AremRed

Just watched it. WOW. It looks like he went to signal charge but changed his mind mid-signal and counted it. If he counted it, why no block signal??

Yeah, watching live I had the exact same thought. Body language looked like he wanted to go offense but he changed his mind. The endline camera angle on replay really made it look like a bad ball. But oh well.

And I grew up watching college b-ball with Dickie V as an announcer. I may be one of the few that still enjoys him but his commentary at the end about officials having to let coaches react was ludicrous.

Fortunately, Bilas set him straight.

[twocentsworth]

the blocking foul called against Syracuse earlier in the half was really bad - should have clearly been an offensive foul.

the call near the end of the game was borderline....based on the calls during the year AND the call against Syracuse earlier in the 2nd half, I can see why Boeheim wents nuts...BUT you just can't do that to your team at the end of the game.

[BryanV21]

As much as I hate to say it, being a big 'Cuse fan, but I don't have a problem with the charging call at the end.

[Spence]

At what point in the drive is the latest a defender can legally get the position required?

Picks up dribble?
Goes up off the pivot foot?

[LeeBallanfant]

Boeheim has to go to Kim Mulkey's Summer Camp and learn how to remove his jacket.

[biz]

Full disclosure: I am a Syracuse grad.


On first look - live action of the play at 10 seconds - I thought it was a block. Then on the first replay I thought it was so close that I couldn't be upset with the call either way. Then when I saw the replay from the other end of the court I see the Duke defender stepping toward Fair after the upward motion had started.

From an officiating standpoint, putting myself in Greene's shoes. I thought that was as difficult a block/charge as I've seen this year and I thought it was made tougher by Greene being in mid rotation. I'm not sure he got a great look at the defender as he was looking over his shoulder while rotating across the lane.

Either way, is Vitale insane???? He wouldn't have T'd up Boeheim??? That was an easy ejection and I'm sure no one on here will disagree with that.

[biz]

Originally Posted by Spence

At what point in the drive is the latest a defender can legally get the position required?

Picks up dribble?
Goes up off the pivot foot?

NCAA-M as of this year it is when the upward motion of the shooter has started.

[fiasco]

Originally Posted by biz

NCAA-M as of this year it is when the upward motion of the shooter has started.

But how do you define upward motion?

Originally Posted by fiasco

But how do you define upward motion?

How about according to the rule?

NCAA 4-17-4-d: "When the opponent with the ball is airborne, the guard shall have attained legal guarding position before the opponent begins his upward motion with his hands/arms to shoot or pass."

Originally Posted by LeeBallanfant

Boeheim has to go to Kim Mulkey's Summer Camp and learn how to remove his jacket.

Hopefully he doesn't show up next year wearing spaghetti straps too!

[JetMetFan]

Originally Posted by VaTerp

And I grew up watching college b-ball with Dickie V as an announcer. I may be one of the few that still enjoys him but his commentary at the end about officials having to let coaches react was ludicrous.

Fortunately, Bilas set him straight.

So I guess Boeheim would've had to beat down one of the officials for Vitale to consider a T.