0 and 00 on the roster

[bob jenkins]

[QUOTE=ronny mulkey;874536]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

There's never (?) a penalty to discover and correct prior to the 10-minute mark.

Bob,

I think what I meant to ask: If you discover before the 10 minutes mark and bring it to Coach's attention, is there a penalty if the coach wants both to remain on the roster?

Asked and answered.

There's no penalty to have both on the roster. There's no penalty if only one plays. There is a penalty if (and when) the second one enters the game.

[BillyMac]

Regarding 0 and 00:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

There's no penalty to have both on the roster. There's no penalty if only one plays. There is a penalty if (and when) the second one enters the game.

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Illegal (if they both play).

Penalty:

Technical fouls for illegal uniforms (including illegal numbers) are not charged to the team, but are charged directly to the head coach. If a team member participates as a player while wearing an illegal uniform, then a direct technical foul is charged to the head coach, who will lose the coaching box privilege for the remainder of the game. This infraction is penalized when discovered, and the team member with the illegal uniform may participate without further penalty and is not required to change the number. A maximum of one technical foul shall be charged directly to the head coach regardless of the number of offenders.

[Camron Rust]

[QUOTE=bob jenkins;874540]

Originally Posted by ronny mulkey

Asked and answered.

There's no penalty to have both on the roster. There's no penalty if only one plays. There is a penalty if (and when) the second one enters the game.

Actually, bob, it is illegal to have both 0 and 00 listed on the roster whether they play or not. They are considered to be "identical numbers". See 3-2-2e.

This would be an administrative T as the uniforms themselves are legal but the listing in the book with both legal numbers is not legal.

If either of the players wanted to play, one would need to change and there would be no further penalty as the single administrative T would have already been incurred.

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Actually, bob, it is illegal to have both 0 and 00 listed on the roster whether they play or not. They are considered to be "identical numbers". See 3-2-2e.

I don't get this reading 3-2-2e. Does something somewhere else specifically say that 0 and 00 are considered identical numbers?

[bob jenkins]

[QUOTE=Camron Rust;874560]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Actually, bob, it is illegal to have both 0 and 00 listed on the roster whether they play or not. They are considered to be "identical numbers". See 3-2-2e.

This would be an administrative T as the uniforms themselves are legal but the listing in the book with both legal numbers is not legal.

If either of the players wanted to play, one would need to change and there would be no further penalty as the single administrative T would have already been incurred.

See the interp in post #4:

after the game starts, there is no infraction if only one of the team members (No. 0 or No. 00) participates

[PG_Ref]

[QUOTE=Camron Rust;874560]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Actually, bob, it is illegal to have both 0 and 00 listed on the roster whether they play or not. They are considered to be "identical numbers". See 3-2-2e.

This would be an administrative T as the uniforms themselves are legal but the listing in the book with both legal numbers is not legal.

If either of the players wanted to play, one would need to change and there would be no further penalty as the single administrative T would have already been incurred.

I would have to disagree that they are considered identical numbers. I believe the intent to not have both on the roster is to eliminate possible confusion when reporting fouls. I would say illegal, yes. Identical, no. If two players have identical numbers, someone has to get a different number. But, both 0 and 00 can both play, at the expense of a T.

[Texref]

0 and 00 are no more identical than 1/11, 2/22, 3/33, 4/44, and 5,55. As has been answered, only penalty in the OP is if both team members participate. Why, bc the rule book specifies that 0/00 can't play without a penalty. Nothing to have them both listed.

[Camron Rust]

[QUOTE=PG_Ref;874569]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

I would have to disagree that they are considered identical numbers. I believe the intent to not have both on the roster is to eliminate possible confusion when reporting fouls. I would say illegal, yes. Identical, no. If two players have identical numbers, someone has to get a different number. But, both 0 and 00 can both play, at the expense of a T.

Originally Posted by Texref

0 and 00 are no more identical than 1/11, 2/22, 3/33, 4/44, and 5,55. As has been answered, only penalty in the OP is if both team members participate. Why, bc the rule book specifies that 0/00 can't play without a penalty. Nothing to have them both listed.

Yes, they are considered identical...that is the resaon that there is an issue to begin with...maybe a special case of identical, but still identical. Many electronic statistical programs are based on player number and don't/can't separate 0 from 00. 0 and 00 are not like 1 and 11 but are like 1 and 01. Those are identical numbers. If you don't think they are identical, subtract one from the other and see what you get....you don't get the same result with 1 and 11.

I stand corrected in how the NFHS wants them handled, but the basis behind the restriction is that they are identical to record keeping systems.

[Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.]

Both numbers are legal. They are not identical. In the Ancient Days it was legal to have players wearing both numbers and playing at the same time: "zero" or "double zero". When the first computer programs for basketball statistics were first written, the software could not differentiate between the uniform number "0" and the uniform number "00" therefore the rule change by both the NFHS and NCAA. They are both legal numbers, they are not identical numbers, but a team must just between "0" and "00".

MTD, Sr.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

Both numbers are legal. They are not identical. In the Ancient Days it was legal to have players wearing both numbers and playing at the same time: "zero" or "double zero". When the first computer programs for basketball statistics were first written, the software could not differentiate between the uniform number "0" and the uniform number "00" therefore the rule change by both the NFHS and NCAA. They are both legal numbers, they are not identical numbers, but a team must just between "0" and "00".

MTD, Sr.

Are 2 and 02 identical? Yes, yes they are. So are 0 and 00. Regardless, you can't have both.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

(0 and 00) are considered identical.

Try telling that to the croupier at the Venetian Resort and Casino in Las Vegas when you have $1000.00 on 0 and the ball falls into 00 on the roulette wheel.

[Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Try telling that to the croupier at the Venetian Resort and Casino in Las Vegas when you have $1000.00 on 0 and the ball falls into 00 on the roulette wheel.

+1,000

MTD, Sr.