![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
Me too. What advantage did A1 gain? Contact that yields no advantage — and in this instance disadvantaged the player — is generally not a foul.
__________________
Never trust an atom: they make up everything. |
|
|||
|
While there was no direct body contact, it can't be fair that B1 is displaced nonetheless.
The immediate turnover negates a whistle, but without it, I think you have to at least consider calling a foul. I'd like to see a case play that describes using the ball to clear space to move.
__________________
Pope Francis |
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
|
Quote:
What if A1 does this again and instead of taking the ball cleanly B1 hacks A1 across the arm as he/she takes the ball? What if A1 puts the ball in B1's face next time instead of his/her chest? What if a slight push with the ball like this is used to create space to shoot? Even a timely word of caution to A1 would help this situation. If I was a player and knew this was allowable, I would push the envelope until you called a foul on me then I would ask you what your standard is for calling this a foul. Can I push the defender away a foot, two feet, one step, two steps, I can only do it if I get the ball stolen, only if the defender creates a jump ball?
__________________
"Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are." -- John Wooden |
|
|||
|
This seems clear to me as well. I don't see how you can look at it any other way.
|
|
|||
|
Tom, if he gets an advantage from the contact, then it's a foul. Surely we agree about that.
It didn't seem that A1 got an advantage in the OP. If I'm wrong about that — which is a bit HTBT — then call the foul, but it's silly to quibble about judgment unless we have some video that could help settle it.
__________________
Never trust an atom: they make up everything. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
"Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are." -- John Wooden |
|
|||
|
I want to lean toward this being a PC foul as well. If we can penalize A with a technical foul for using the ball illegally (against the spirit of the game/rules) in an instance, shouldn't we be able to for using the ball to gain an illegal advantage in this situation?
__________________
I can't remember the last time I wasn't at least kind-of tired. |
|
|||
|
I've seen it and have called it a PC before.
Conversely would we call a push on a defender for pushing the ball into A1, knocking him back?
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers |
|
|||
|
Depending on the severity, you aren't? Again, if I was a player that used every edge - and I did - I would leave a trail of defenders with bloody noses as a coasted to the basket. Hmmm, that may cause someone to get upset and want to fight me for popping them in the nose with the ball. Would they have a reason for being upset?
Where do you draw the line?
__________________
"Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are." -- John Wooden |
|
|||
|
Nah, the first bloody nose will result in a Technical Foul, probably Flagrant.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ball Hits Defender | APG | Basketball | 5 | Thu Mar 08, 2012 12:46pm |
| Defender slaps ball out of inbounder's hands | ballgame99 | Basketball | 34 | Thu Dec 15, 2011 11:30am |
| violation- tossing the ball aganist the defender | mutantducky | Basketball | 12 | Sun Jan 18, 2009 11:29am |
| Defender hits dribbler's hand; ball goes OOB; Whatcha got? | Jimgolf | Basketball | 37 | Fri Dec 07, 2007 02:50pm |
| Batting ball, pushing | cropduster | Basketball | 3 | Thu Oct 23, 2003 04:28pm |