The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 24, 2002, 11:24am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 81
NFHS game last night where A1 starts his shooting motion to attempt a set shot. B1 blocks the shot so that it cannot be released and the ball is suspended; and would definetly be a held ball if this was a jump shot. However I am wondering if the fact that the shot attempt was a set shot where the shooter did not leave the floor has any bearing on calling this a jump ball?

thanks again
GTW
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 24, 2002, 11:28am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
No effect. If the ball was prevented from being released, it is a "held ball" go to the arrow for possession. If the ball was released, even microscopically, and the blocked back into the shooter's hands, it is a blocked shot, NOT TRAVELLING, although occasionally you'll see someone call it this way. Incidentally, even if the ball-handler isn't shooting, but is just passing, if the ball is prevented from being released, it is a "held ball". AP. I'm using strictly NF rules.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 24, 2002, 03:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 81
re: definetly not traveling

thanks for the reply. To clarify it would indeed be a held ball, not a "no call" when a set shot is blocked and prevented from being released, right?

Merry Christmas!!!
GTW
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 24, 2002, 07:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 272
Send a message via AIM to firedoc
Any shot which is prevented from leaving the shooter's hand would result in a jump ball and possession determined by the AP arrow.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 25, 2002, 03:26am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,004
Read the rule!

Sorry guys, this does not fit the definition of held ball.
4-25 Held Ball
A held ball occurs when:
Art. 1...Opponents have their hands so firmly on the ball that control cannot be obtained without undue roughness.
Art. 2...An opponent places his/her hand(s) on the ball and prevents an airborne player from throwing the ball or releasing it on a try.

The situation at hand does not seem to fit into article 1 and clearly does not fall under article 2 since this part specifies airborne player.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 25, 2002, 11:27am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
I agree, it's a held ball.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 25, 2002, 01:29pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
I agree, it's a held ball.
says it's a held ball,too.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 26, 2002, 10:19am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 81
clarification

getting some contradictory replies so can some please clarify this for sure?

thanks
GTW
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 26, 2002, 10:49am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 504
Re: Read the rule!

Quote:
Originally posted by Nevadaref
Sorry guys, this does not fit the definition of held ball.
4-25 Held Ball
A held ball occurs when:
Art. 1...Opponents have their hands so firmly on the ball that control cannot be obtained without undue roughness.
Art. 2...An opponent places his/her hand(s) on the ball and prevents an airborne player from throwing the ball or releasing it on a try.

The situation at hand does not seem to fit into article 1 and clearly does not fall under article 2 since this part specifies airborne player.
If I'm at Lead and a defender gets a hand on the ball cleanly as to keep A1 from releasing a shot, then 4-25-1 has been met. I'm going to the arrow after blowing my whistle and using the appropriate mechanics to signal a held ball.

But that's just me and the evaluators at the camps I attended this summer.
__________________
I didn't say it was your fault...I said I was going to blame you.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 26, 2002, 10:58am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 521
Re: clarification

Quote:
Originally posted by Troward
getting some contradictory replies so can some please clarify this for sure?

For sure, I think not.

There is no clear case or rule that it is a held ball if the feet are still on the floor. As there is a rule and case if the shooter is airborne. So I go with no held ball.

The problem is, for me, if the big paw of the defender is actually holding/around the ball as the shot is being taken but the shooter retains the ball after the block. What is it then?

Then if you want to say it is a held ball on a shot than what about a pass?
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 26, 2002, 03:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 426
Send a message via AIM to dhodges007 Send a message via Yahoo to dhodges007
Easy jump ball call. If you don't make a call, then what? Now both teams are yelling for a time out, who do you give it to? Don't be too pure call it a jump. That is what a WNBA official told me this summer. Neither coach will have a problem with it and obviously we won't either.
__________________
~Hodges

My two sense!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 27, 2002, 06:44am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,004
Those of you who don't call this play according to the rule are making it difficult for those of us that do. You are failing to educate the players and coaches on the proper rules of the game by calling this way.

Now LarryS and I disagree about whether or not this play meets the requirements of article 1, but that is fine. At least he is justifying his call with part of the rule. This so-and-so told me to call a held ball on this play so the coaches won't complain rationale is nonsense.

Your duty as an official is to follow the rule.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 27, 2002, 09:01am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 292
This seems to be a subject that is called differently in my area as well. In HS (FED) games I will call a held ball any time the shooter is prevented from releasing the ball while in the air (as long as there is not body contact before or at the same time the held ball occurs. IMO you are rewarding the defense for making a clean play in this situation and not bailing out the offense by making a no call or calling the sometimes "phantom" foul. For a player on the ground trying to go up with a shot or making a pass, if they are prevented from releasing the ball (it does not immediately get "stolen" by the defense or fall to the floor, is this not a held ball as well?? IMO the offensive player then has to attempt to "rip" the ball away from the defender and IMO that can be thought of as undue roughness. I do see a lot of ref's in my area call this differently. BUt I personally have very few coaches who have issues with it being called this way. Just my thoughts....
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 27, 2002, 11:26am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 476
Send a message via ICQ to SamNVa Send a message via AIM to SamNVa Send a message via Yahoo to SamNVa
I'm new to this board, so go easy on me. I always thought that the intent of the rule about calling a held ball when an airborne player was prevented from releasing a shot was to ptotect the offense from an up and down violation. The held ball call at least gives the ball back to the offense half the time. As such, a blocked shot against a player still on the floor would not automatically be a held ball unless the defense demonstrates some kind of control of the ball.

SamC
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 27, 2002, 11:44am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally posted by SamNVa
I'm new to this board, so go easy on me. I always thought that the intent of the rule about calling a held ball when an airborne player was prevented from releasing a shot was to ptotect the offense from an up and down violation. The held ball call at least gives the ball back to the offense half the time. As such, a blocked shot against a player still on the floor would not automatically be a held ball unless the defense demonstrates some kind of control of the ball.

SamC
Mr. Carter,
Welcome to the Hoops side! You do such a fine job on the "Diamond", I am pleased to have you here.

The intent, I believe, in all cases is to reward the defense for a good, clean play.
When a defender prevents the release of the ball for a try, or merely a pass, the act is rewarded with a held ball.
No control has to be shown other than the offensive player being unable to get the ball off their own hand. ...A sort of stalemate.
mick
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1