|
||||
My comments earlier notwithstanding, item #1 in the OP would have drawn a warning to the HC for me. I certainly wouldn't have answered the comment from the AC.
His final comment in #2 would have drawn a T from me. I'm assuming all future discussions would have taken a different format after the T.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
this is an interesting thread; thanks to all.
i have two questions: newer ref, 3rd year, mid-level rating in out pool. first, regarding the dropped shoulder- some of our guys say its an automatic charge...some don't. i don't know what to do. i've only called it twice (dropped shoulder charge), neither time was the call in doubt. can any of you veterans expound on when this wouldn't be a charge? secondly, i don't know how to handle the ***'t coaches. twice this year they have been yapping at me. do you guys even respond to them, or just tell the head coach to control his bench? a guy in our pool told me to never give a t to an ***'t coach...that it is always a t, indirect to the head coach, which counts towards ejection. any advice would be appreciated. thank you. |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
Say the assistant coach calls you an a-hole, you hit the bench & indirect to the HC. He says it again, you could've ran him this time but you chose not to assess it to the AC. If I have definite knowledge of the offender on the bench, I give it directly to them & indirectly to the coach.
__________________
I gotta new attitude! |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
It sounds like you've been advised to T the HC instead of the AC under the theory he's responsible for the AC's conduct. Don't do this. The indirect T the coach gets already takes care of this. |
|
||||
Quote:
Knowing whether the defender has LGP is the key here. Quote:
A quick word to the HC will usually take care of it; "Coach, I'll answer questions if I have time, but your AC doesn't get the same privileges you do." That usually works, or you can be more direct with, "Coach, please take control of your bench."
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
Quote:
In your second question, I'm not quite following - are you saying you've been told not to give a T to an assistant coach, because it would also be an indirect to the HC? If so, that would be bad advice. That is exactly the reason you would inform the HC that they are indeed responsible for the behavior of their benches, and if the HC cannot control it, the HC will also be penalized with the indirect.
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department. (Used with permission.) |
|
|||
I guess I'm losing my speed typing skills.
So, what they said, above.
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department. (Used with permission.) |
|
|||
Wow. Just wow.
Where to start? I guess you are lucky you didn't have to listen to the rest of the game in your car. Were you hoping the official would see you officiate in a game sometime to see how it's done? Too bad Padgett didn't have your game. Your shoes wouldn't have been the only thing that got puked on, and deservedly so.
__________________
Never hit a piņata if you see hornets flying out of it. |
|
||||
Sorry to say, but you were "that guy." You know, the coach that lets everyone know that he is an official (whether you did or not).
I'm certainly not perfect and I've worked with partners that make mistakes too, but had I known you were an official and you acted that way, you'd probably be checking which radio station was carrying the game so you could listen in the car. In #1, why are you talking to the official? You're the assistant coach - keep your mouth shut. #2 I'd whack you right there. I wouldn't have said what that official said, certainly, but that phrase from you would result in free throws being shot and your wife sitting down. #3 - Whack if you hadn't had one. Ejection if you had. #4 - You really have nerve as an assistant coach. Sounds like the officials aren't the only one who have learning to do. Sounds like you need to learn your role. Hint: It's a more silent one when it comes to the officials. |
|
|||
Quote:
so, if the assistant coach gets a t, it is an indirect to the head coach. we're shooting only two, though, right? |
|
|||
Correct. With the added penalty of the HC losing the coaching box priviledges.
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department. (Used with permission.) |
|
|||
Quote:
There is never an indirect T without a direct T. And only the direct T is penalized in the form of free throws and possession. The only impact of an indirect T is that it ends the coach's coaching box privileges and counts as one of his three toward ejection. |
|
|||
There is a great summary of technical fouls following the rules section. I refer to it several times during the season. No shots for indirect...they are given because of someone else's infraction.
__________________
Never hit a piņata if you see hornets flying out of it. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rule 6 3O enforcement - 20 second pitch rule | wadeintothem | Softball | 5 | Tue Jun 30, 2009 03:33pm |
Rule 1, The Forgotten Rule | TxJim | Football | 14 | Thu Jan 04, 2007 07:02pm |
How would you rule? | greymule | Softball | 31 | Wed Jun 21, 2006 03:15am |
New rule | Hawks Coach | Basketball | 9 | Wed May 21, 2003 06:47am |