![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
I think Camron covered this in his post pretty much but since you are asking me....: Plain and simple the team legally attempted a shot in your scenario, meaning the ball either contacted the rim or went in. By the sounds of the college rule. If a player is just dribbling the clock out and there was supposed to be a 1 second differential and the officials don't hit their whistle or "recognize" it I guess I should say, and the game clocks runs to zeros then the game would be over???? To me and the background with which I've been taught, this doesn't make sense to me to allow a team more than their allotted time in a possession. Is it possible that the NCAA uses this rule so that officials don't have to worry about knowing the time of possessions and also so they don't have to worry about resetting the clock to its appropriate time? It just makes it easier on the refs? I mean this in hopes of getting an honest answer, as I am not trying to be condescending as it sounds...
__________________
"players must decide the outcome of the game with legal actions, not illegal actions which an official chooses to ignore." |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UNC/URI shot clock violation...? Or not | zeedonk | Basketball | 5 | Thu Apr 01, 2010 01:28pm |
Shot clock violation | Terrapins Fan | Basketball | 1 | Wed Feb 24, 2010 11:14pm |
Shot Clock Violation? | OHBBREF | Basketball | 8 | Wed Jan 17, 2007 08:29pm |
SHOT CLOCK VIOLATION? | MRIGUY | Basketball | 9 | Mon Dec 19, 2005 08:58pm |
Is it a Shot Clock Violation? | RdBallRef | Basketball | 7 | Tue Nov 06, 2001 01:50pm |