How Would You Have Handled This?

[bas2456]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

Just for clarification, the sophomore team had 2 AC's on the bench, the Varsity HC and the AC you asked to be seated?

Or is the Varsity HC the AC you are referring to?

I only noticed one assistant besides the head coach for the sophomore team. I couldn't tell ya who the varsity coach is for this school...first time I'd had them. S/he was probably with his/her team preparing to play.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by bas2456

I only noticed one assistant besides the head coach for the sophomore team. I couldn't tell ya who the varsity coach is for this school...first time I'd had them. S/he was probably with his/her team preparing to play.

Your OP says you gave a T to the "V HC".

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

Your OP says you gave a T to the "V HC".

Visitors Head Coach

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by just another ref

Visitors Head Coach

Thanks...thought I was crazy for a second.

So really, the T against the HC had nothing to do with the scenario. AC has no business standing. Directing the AC to be seated was the appropriate action by the OP, whether a T had been called earlier or not.

[bas2456]

Originally Posted by just another ref

Visitors Head Coach

Thanks jar...

Let's say though that the outcome of the game is in doubt, does that change what you would do?

[APG]

I would of handled the situation exactly as you did regardless of how close the score was. This is assuming the AC was not argumentative and sat down immediately.

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by AllPurposeGamer

I would of handled the situation exactly as you did regardless of how close the score was. This is assuming the AC was not argumentative and sat down immediately.

+1

I phrase the warning as, "you need to stay seated," or "you can't be standing," so that if there's an issue later I can address it.

That is, I won't give an AC more than one warning, so I want the warning to be perfectly clear.