![]() |
|
|||
|
case book play situation
4.19.8 SITUATION C: A1 drives for a try and jumps and releases the ball. Contact occurs between A1 and B1 after the release and before airborne shooter A1 returns one foot to the floor. One official calls a blocking foul on B1 & the other official calls a charging foul on A1. The try is (a) successful, or (b) not successful.
RULING: Even though airborne shooter A1 committed a charging foul, it is not a player-control foul because the two fouls result in a double personal foul. The double foul does not cause the ball to become dead on the try. In (a), the goal is scored; play is resumed at the point of interruption, which is a throw-in for Team B from anywhere along the end line. In (b), the point of interruption is a try in flight; therefore the alternating-possession procedure is used. (4-36) Ok, I may a judgement in error on how I thought of the play as like it states above, AP should of been used as the try in flight was unsuccessful. MY BAD ![]() However the shooter was allowed the 2 FTs, with no AP.
__________________
"Ask not what your teammates can do for you. Ask what you can do for your teammates"--Earvin "Magic" Johnson |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DOUBLE FOUL???? | mtbabo | Basketball | 6 | Mon Aug 16, 2004 09:02pm |
| Double Foul? | Troward | Basketball | 1 | Thu Dec 26, 2002 10:08am |
| double foul? | RX Ref | Basketball | 3 | Thu Feb 28, 2002 04:47pm |
| double foul? | RX Ref | Basketball | 4 | Thu Feb 28, 2002 02:27pm |
| Double Foul | commish | Baseball | 2 | Tue Dec 26, 2000 11:02am |