Double Foul tonight during Boys' C-Squad

[just another ref]

They shot free throws with players lined up on the lane spaces as usual?

[chseagle]

Originally Posted by just another ref

They shot free throws with players lined up on the lane spaces as usual?

Yeah normal 2 shoot FT procedure. After reviewing the case book, the POI was the unsuccessful try, so the AP should of been used.

[just another ref]

A double foul involves 2 fouls committed by opponents against each other.

Keep looking.

[chseagle]

Originally Posted by just another ref

A double foul involves 2 fouls committed by opponents against each other.

Keep looking.

Perhaps I'm thinking of a simultaneous foul situation, instead of the double foul.

Rule 4-19-10 instead of Rule 4-19-8.

[doubleringer]

From the one post, it sounds as though the shooting foul was called slightly before the second foul. Did you think of getting together and taking one or the other (I'd personally go witht he shooter) and dropping the other? It would have cleared up alot of confusion.

[Smitty]

Originally Posted by doubleringer

From the one post, it sounds as though the shooting foul was called slightly before the second foul. Did you think of getting together and taking one or the other (I'd personally go witht he shooter) and dropping the other? It would have cleared up alot of confusion.

He's not an official. He's just masquerading as one.

[cmathews]

Originally Posted by doubleringer

From the one post, it sounds as though the shooting foul was called slightly before the second foul. Did you think of getting together and taking one or the other (I'd personally go witht he shooter) and dropping the other? It would have cleared up alot of confusion.

It would have cleared up the confusion right up until the coach from the defensive team got a T for wanting to know why you decided not to penalize the offense.

I think you can go with simultaneous or false double here. I would lean toward false double. It appears to be the most equitable for the situation. Penalize both in order of occurance.....

If you go simultaneous you still have some more searching to do on how it should have been handled...

[Scratch85]

Originally Posted by chseagle

Rule 4-19-10 instead of Rule 4-19-8.

Look at the one between those you have mentioned.

I disagree with Doubleringer. As I understand the OP, you have fouls by both teams at approximately the same time but not against each other (different players). Penalize both.

[A Pennsylvania Coach]

Originally Posted by chseagle

so the AP should of been used.

Dude. Please. It's "should have" or "should've."

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by A Pennsylvania Coach

It's "should have" or "should've."

Why is mbyron allowed to have two registered usernames?

[Adam]

You can, too, Billy. But we'd all know it was you the first time "TransylvTranny" copied and pasted a paragraph from your myths.