Double Foul tonight during Boys' C-Squad
Had a double foul tonight during the Boys' C-Squad game. 1 was a shooting foul, the other foul was off the ball. The penalty for the shooting foul was 2 shots, with no penalty for the off the ball foul.
1 foul against each team. No AP change. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
As I saw the play, it seemed kosher the way it was called, as they did not actually happen simutaneously. Am wondering other's opinions, as the visiting coach was thinking the AP should of been used as the POI. |
They shot free throws with players lined up on the lane spaces as usual?
|
case book play situation
4.19.8 SITUATION C: A1 drives for a try and jumps and releases the ball. Contact occurs between A1 and B1 after the release and before airborne shooter A1 returns one foot to the floor. One official calls a blocking foul on B1 & the other official calls a charging foul on A1. The try is (a) successful, or (b) not successful.
RULING: Even though airborne shooter A1 committed a charging foul, it is not a player-control foul because the two fouls result in a double personal foul. The double foul does not cause the ball to become dead on the try. In (a), the goal is scored; play is resumed at the point of interruption, which is a throw-in for Team B from anywhere along the end line. In (b), the point of interruption is a try in flight; therefore the alternating-possession procedure is used. (4-36) Ok, I may a judgement in error on how I thought of the play as like it states above, AP should of been used as the try in flight was unsuccessful. MY BAD :( However the shooter was allowed the 2 FTs, with no AP. |
Quote:
|
A double foul involves 2 fouls committed by opponents against each other.
Keep looking. |
Quote:
Rule 4-19-10 instead of Rule 4-19-8. |
From the one post, it sounds as though the shooting foul was called slightly before the second foul. Did you think of getting together and taking one or the other (I'd personally go witht he shooter) and dropping the other? It would have cleared up alot of confusion.
|
Quote:
He's not an official. He's just masquerading as one. :rolleyes: |
what????
Quote:
I think you can go with simultaneous or false double here. I would lean toward false double. It appears to be the most equitable for the situation. Penalize both in order of occurance..... If you go simultaneous you still have some more searching to do on how it should have been handled... |
Quote:
I disagree with Doubleringer. As I understand the OP, you have fouls by both teams at approximately the same time but not against each other (different players). Penalize both. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:50pm. |