The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 15, 2010, 10:05am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 280
Substitution

2 situations last night that I think I missed.

1. Basket goes in - lead blows whistle for a goal tending call - but the ball went in anyway - we allowed subs - right or wrong?

2. I am lead and blow for a delay of game warning - as I notify the book - I have a brain fart and let the subs in - right or wrong?

I assume wrong in both instances!
__________________
Refsmitty
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 15, 2010, 10:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,847
Why do you think you were wrong? If there's a whistle, even if it was an inadvertent whiste, bring the subs in.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 15, 2010, 10:09am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 280
We discussed and thought advantage - disadvantage.
__________________
Refsmitty
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 15, 2010, 10:11am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,847
You thought wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 15, 2010, 10:14am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: WI
Posts: 825
Quote:
Originally Posted by Refsmitty View Post
We discussed and thought advantage - disadvantage.
play was already stopped - let them in
__________________
When I want your opinion - I'll give it to you!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 15, 2010, 10:20am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Suwanee Georgia
Posts: 1,050
As others have said....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Refsmitty View Post
We discussed and thought advantage - disadvantage.
Let them sub in. Once you blow your whistle play has stopped and the ball is dead or will become dead once a try has ended. Even on an inadvertent whistle. There is no advantage/disadvantage here.
__________________
Gwinnett Umpires Association
Multicounty Softball Association
Multicounty Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 15, 2010, 10:25am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Refsmitty View Post
We discussed and thought advantage - disadvantage.
I have to admit I'm curious what you thought A/D had to do with this play.

Subs are to be allowed in anytime the ball is dead with the clock stopped, with a couple of exceptions that don't apply here (free throws or "needs to sit a tick" situations.) Even with inadvertent whistles.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 15, 2010, 10:29am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 280
We were thinking that if a coach wanted to get a player in bad enough - he may be willing to take a delay of game warning to stop the clock. It would be his first warning - no biggie...
__________________
Refsmitty
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 15, 2010, 10:31am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by Refsmitty View Post
We were thinking that if a coach wanted to get a player in bad enough - he may be willing to take a delay of game warning to stop the clock. It would be his first warning - no biggie...

That could also be interpreted as good coaching. And you would be providing a disadvantage to his team if you disallowed the subs.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 15, 2010, 10:32am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Refsmitty View Post
We were thinking that if a coach wanted to get a player in bad enough - he may be willing to take a delay of game warning to stop the clock. It would be his first warning - no biggie...
Ah, gotcha. Well, he'd be ok doing so, too, and risking one of his players later committing another DOG violation. There's no rule or case play saying to ignore the subs here, so by rule you'd have to allow it.

The good news is, he can only do it once.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 15, 2010, 10:35am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,896
Quote:
Originally Posted by Refsmitty View Post
We were thinking that if a coach wanted to get a player in bad enough - he may be willing to take a delay of game warning to stop the clock. It would be his first warning - no biggie...
If he wants a player in that bad, that's his choice.

Snaqs identified the exceptions where we don't allow any substitutions (free throws) and where a player is not eligible to substitute yet (hasn't sat a tick after leaving the game), but the only exception I can think of where an eligible substitute is not allowed in the game while the clock is stopped other than the free throw situation is when they report after the first warning horn during a timeout or intermission.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 15, 2010, 10:37am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Refsmitty View Post
We were thinking that if a coach wanted to get a player in bad enough - he may be willing to take a delay of game warning to stop the clock. It would be his first warning - no biggie...
By the way, you'll note the NFHS remedy for preventing an unwarranted advantage from a DOG or other defensive violation is simply to ignore or delay the violation, or go straight to a technical foul if necessary.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 15, 2010, 10:50am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 381
Did you guys pre-game that L would be making goaltending calls?
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 15, 2010, 11:09am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 598
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
By the way, you'll note the NFHS remedy for preventing an unwarranted advantage from a DOG or other defensive violation is simply to ignore or delay the violation, or go straight to a technical foul if necessary.
Yeah, was just thinking about that. If a coach were to purposely use DOG to stop the clock in a very close game with a few seconds left, couldn't you either ignore that or T him up (or the player(s) who DOGed it)?
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 15, 2010, 11:14am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by representing View Post
Yeah, was just thinking about that. If a coach were to purposely use DOG to stop the clock in a very close game with a few seconds left, couldn't you either ignore that or T him up (or the player(s) who DOGed it)?
Yes, there's a case play that instructs us to do just that if the coach does it with less than 5 seconds left.

9.2.10 Comment
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Substitution curtstrouth Basketball 15 Thu Oct 29, 2009 07:11am
DH Substitution Fritz Baseball 8 Wed May 20, 2009 08:46am
Substitution bluedevil_coach Football 3 Sat Sep 25, 2004 08:47pm
Substitution Nyjets Football 4 Wed Sep 08, 2004 09:56am
substitution or not? shipwreck Softball 7 Sat Apr 10, 2004 05:51pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1