The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Sun Dec 20, 2009, 04:45pm
M.A.S.H.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by representing View Post
One last thing, one of the two or three the referees on the court must "witness" the unconsciousness of a player. If none of them sees it, then the player got away with it. Happened to my sister, she was knocked unconscious after hitting her head hard on the floor when she fell during one game, but was out for only a few seconds. Neither referee at that game saw it before running to where she was laying. She got lucky with that one and was back in the game a few minutes later.
Quote:
Originally Posted by representing View Post
THIS is what I meant. Determined apparently unconscious. Who shall be the determiner? the referees. I didn't say anything about witnessing the player to be unconscious or the play that caused the player to be rendered unconscious. I only said that the officials have to be there to see the player be unconscious in order to rule that he/she may not play without written authorization by a doctor.
Misunderstood you the first time, I thought you were saying they had to see the action that caused it - my bad. But given your second post now you are incorrect.

The player doesn't have to be unconscious when the officials get to the player. As you pointed out it says "determined apparently unconscious". Therefore, if the player is showing signs or symptoms of being unconscious then they are done until written authorization. They don't have to be knocked out and not responding when you get to the player.

So in your case, just because the officials didn't get to her while she was knocked out they still could have said she was determined apparently unconscious by signs or symptoms and not allowed her to play until she got written authorization.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Sun Dec 20, 2009, 05:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 598
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjones1 View Post
Misunderstood you the first time, I thought you were saying they had to see the action that caused it - my bad. But given your second post now you are incorrect.

The player doesn't have to be unconscious when the officials get to the player. As you pointed out it says "determined apparently unconscious". Therefore, if the player is showing signs or symptoms of being unconscious then they are done until written authorization. They don't have to be knocked out and not responding when you get to the player.

So in your case, just because the officials didn't get to her while she was knocked out they still could have said she was determined apparently unconscious by signs or symptoms and not allowed her to play until she got written authorization.
Good point. Now that you say that... but how would you explain that to the coach? "well, she's not feeling well, she's dizzy, etc.". Coach could just argue that the player did just hit her head and it could be a minor concussion. For me, it would be a much better argument had you seen the player actually unconscious with your own eyes (or partner's eyes seeing it).
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Sun Dec 20, 2009, 05:43pm
M.A.S.H.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by representing View Post
Good point. Now that you say that... but how would you explain that to the coach? "well, she's not feeling well, she's dizzy, etc.". Coach could just argue that the player did just hit her head and it could be a minor concussion. For me, it would be a much better argument had you seen the player actually unconscious with your own eyes (or partner's eyes seeing it).
Good question.

If the coach's arguement was that it was a minor concussion the converstation would be over pretty quick as the point would have been proven. Major or minor isn't a factor.

However, if the coach argues the player is just dizzy, etc... I would just tell the coach that I am siding on safety. They should hopefully understand that and if they don't then that's too bad. No note, no play.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Sun Dec 20, 2009, 05:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 598
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjones1 View Post
Good question.

If the coach's arguement was that it was a minor concussion the converstation would be over pretty quick as the point would have been proven. Major or minor isn't a factor.

However, if the coach argues the player is just dizzy, etc... I would just tell the coach that I am siding on safety. They should hopefully understand that and if they don't then that's too bad. No note, no play.
That coach just better hope one of his/her player is the son/daughter of a doctor then, haha.

All good points. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Injury question... dsturdy5 Basketball 10 Tue Aug 25, 2009 09:07am
bleeding player + injury question bcl1127 Football 7 Tue Oct 28, 2008 04:49pm
KS - Neb Injury johnnyrao Basketball 8 Sun Jan 13, 2008 03:02pm
RFP after injury Patton Football 3 Sun Aug 28, 2005 02:51am
injury and substitution question Man in Grey Basketball 19 Tue Nov 30, 2004 09:12pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:11pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1