The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 25, 2009, 07:25pm
Archaic Power Monger
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,983
Here, we switch only on shooting fouls. The calling official will go to table-side trail.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
Reply With Quote
  #62 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 25, 2009, 08:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 1,955
I've only had one game with it but I didn't like the change for the following reasons:
1. Harder to see subs
2. Talking or listening (or trying to ignore) a coach when I should be focused elsewhere on FT administration issues.
3. I had to T up a coach for being jackass about something I would have never heard had I been across the way.
4. Just felt awkward being that close to the bench and trying to watch for violations, count, etc.
JMO
__________________
That's my whistle -- and I'm sticking to it!
Reply With Quote
  #63 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 25, 2009, 10:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,643
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
Luke: I know exactly what switching is. The old mechanic was that officials switch on every foul. That is no longer the mechanic, which was my main point to Welpe.
Then you want to say that the calling official always becomes the trail official if there are free throws. Being table side or opposite doesn't have anything to do with switching.
Reply With Quote
  #64 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 26, 2009, 06:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by LDUB View Post
Then you want to say that the calling official always becomes the trail official if there are free throws. Being table side or opposite doesn't have anything to do with switching.
The new mechanic entails that we no longer switch on every foul. Under the new mechanic if I'm trail and call a shooting foul, we won't switch. If I'm lead we will.

I generally know what I want to say and post accordingly, but thanks for participating.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #65 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 04, 2009, 10:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Indiana
Posts: 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by refnrev View Post
I've only had one game with it but I didn't like the change for the following reasons:
1. Harder to see subs
2. Talking or listening (or trying to ignore) a coach when I should be focused elsewhere on FT administration issues.
3. I had to T up a coach for being jackass about something I would have never heard had I been across the way.
4. Just felt awkward being that close to the bench and trying to watch for violations, count, etc.
JMO
I have my first game on Monday but I'm thinking the same thing. With the old rule I'm facing the table and can look for subs sitting in front of table or last second subs running up to the table, and see other activity at or near table. (ever have a scorer not use the horn quick enough for subs?) With new rule my back is to the table and I could have comments coming from who knows where...coach, player, parent...and I can't ID the joker. This might even make it more inviting for "unfavorable" comments from the peanut gallery. In most cases communication is fine and most civil discussions happen during dead balls.
I don't get it but I'll adjust. Would like to get opinions on this in February.
Reply With Quote
  #66 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 05, 2009, 09:08am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Henry View Post
I have my first game on Monday but I'm thinking the same thing. With the old rule I'm facing the table and can look for subs sitting in front of table or last second subs running up to the table, and see other activity at or near table. (ever have a scorer not use the horn quick enough for subs?) With new rule my back is to the table and I could have comments coming from who knows where...coach, player, parent...and I can't ID the joker. This might even make it more inviting for "unfavorable" comments from the peanut gallery. In most cases communication is fine and most civil discussions happen during dead balls.
I don't get it but I'll adjust. Would like to get opinions on this in February.
It's not a problem in 3-person; it won't be a problem in 2-person (or if there is a problem, it won't be casued by the mechanic).
Reply With Quote
  #67 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 05, 2009, 11:04am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 6
I have not had a problem with this new mech. First half of the game the coach is wanting to choke you. Second half, he is giving you massages.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
3 man rotation ? roadking Basketball 11 Wed Nov 02, 2005 02:37pm
Rotation Just Curious Softball 2 Wed May 04, 2005 09:38am
2-person all season, 3-person for tournament twoblindrefs Basketball 19 Thu Jan 16, 2003 06:26pm
Should assigners know which officials have expierence in the 3 person rotation? Love2ref4Ever Basketball 30 Fri Sep 27, 2002 06:16am
How Can I Get My Area To Give The Three Person Rotation A Honest Try? Love2ref4Ever Basketball 16 Thu Aug 01, 2002 04:19pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:10pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1