![]() |
|
|||
I know where the violations are found, but where is the current interpretation that says that after a timeout the violation carries over?
I do not see any such reference at this point in the casebook. They talk about what is a violation, but there is nothing that I can find that suggests a violation simply carries over after a timeout. And I understand that we try to use years old interpretations on this site, but I was told by someone that sat on the NF Committee, that when an interpretation is removed from the casebook, there is a reason. In other words, the interpretation has changed or it no longer applies to the current rules. I am still looking, I just do not find such a reference. Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ruling | LongIslandZebra | Baseball | 6 | Thu Nov 03, 2005 09:25am |
Ruling??? | nelson_28602 | Football | 16 | Fri Oct 14, 2005 04:54pm |
ruling? | refTN | Basketball | 3 | Mon Apr 04, 2005 10:58pm |
What is the Ruling? | Metrodom | Basketball | 15 | Mon Jan 26, 2004 08:43pm |
Ruling? | Scotto | Baseball | 4 | Fri Nov 14, 2003 07:16pm |