Thread: Ruling
View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 04, 2009, 02:10pm
JRutledge JRutledge is offline
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
Or they don't want the case book to come in volumes.
The basic implication I was given that the issue does not apply any longer or they decided the interpretation was inappropriate or inconsistent with other rules. It is great to know there is an interpretation from year's past, but something like this current situation should be in some book, somewhere if they want consistency. If I were to try to debate with someone, I would not be able to find the information to prove the point.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote