Angry Coach at Halftime

[fiasco]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

The first one shows we have jurisdiction in the locker room specifically over the use of electronic equipment.

You keep omitting this part for some reason.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by fiasco

You keep omitting this part for some reason.

Because it doesn't tell us anywhere that our jurisdiction is limited to this one rule. That's the reason, I believe I've already stated that.

Case plays aren't designed to cover every single possible situation. Since this situation isn't very common, it's easy to explain why it's not specifically addressed.

There is no rule or case play that says our jurisdiction does not extend to the locker room at half time. Let me repeat my main question here:

Where does it say we don't have jurisdiction here?

Think of this: Referee goes to tell coach that there are 3:00 left in half time. Coach yells, though the door, "Fu@# you!"

I'm calling that T.