![]() |
|
|
|||
Yes -- the coach isnt directly addressing the officials and its in the locker room! I am all for T's when they are necessary, and I think they are way more necessary than they are used and not enough are called. But this situation is a reach.
__________________
in OS I trust |
|
|||
Quote:
This type of commentary continues a few more trips down the court. We let this slide because coach is not directly addressing us?? Or are you saying ignore comments not made directly to us during intermissions?? |
|
|||
Snaq -- are you referring to the situation with the electronics (because that doesnt apply) or 10.4.1 SITUATION B: where its in a public hall and not in THEIR locker room where they have an expectation of privacy. Neither of these cover a T in this situation.
So SNAQ where does it say YOU SHOULD???? Quote:
All I will say to the coach if he says this a couple times is move on from that point. Besides this is good coaching -- he recognizes how we are calling the game (he might not like it) but hes telling his kids to PLAY BETTER DEFENSE. Why would I get upset at this comment. Coaches who cry "Three Seconds" "Thats a travel" blah blah blah, does not bother me. They are just crying for calls. I would not waste my breath on a coach if I hear him say this in a huddle.
__________________
in OS I trust |
|
||||
Quote:
I'm not arguing that you should. I'm arguing that you can.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
So you also then are arguing that it's OK if you don't, right? Just asking because you are kind of confusing me (yeah, yeah, I know it doesn't take much. Shutup.).
|
|
|||
It shows we can WHEN the coach uses electronics to gain an advantage. I think you are reaching here. Either way I would not call a T, but I sure as hell wont give the coach much latitude in the second half.
__________________
in OS I trust |
|
||||
Quote:
The case play tells us specifically we can call the T in one. It's silent on the other. I don't think it's much of a stretch to use the precedent from the case play and apply it to the OP. It's more than a stretch to claim we don't have jurisdiction here. It's a leap.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
||||
Because it doesn't tell us anywhere that our jurisdiction is limited to this one rule. That's the reason, I believe I've already stated that.
Case plays aren't designed to cover every single possible situation. Since this situation isn't very common, it's easy to explain why it's not specifically addressed. There is no rule or case play that says our jurisdiction does not extend to the locker room at half time. Let me repeat my main question here: Where does it say we don't have jurisdiction here? Think of this: Referee goes to tell coach that there are 3:00 left in half time. Coach yells, though the door, "Fu@# you!" I'm calling that T.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
If I had a nickel for every time that I heard a coach make that case after getting whacked...
Quote:
![]() Get real. |
|
|||
Quote:
Says to his players "move your feet, these refs are calling ticky-tack fouls on our end". That could be interpreted as saying we weren't calling ticky-tacks on the other end. But interpretations are in the ears of the interpreter, I guess. I was just killing the notion that we can't penalize commentary that isn't directed towards us even though it's about us. That was your defense on this stance, correct? |
|
|||
[QUOTE=Ch1town;562788]
Oh really? Says to his players "move your feet, these refs are calling ticky-tack fouls on our end". That could be interpreted as saying we weren't calling ticky-tacks on the other end. But interpretations are in the ears of the interpreter, I guess. I was just killing the notion that we can't penalize commentary that isn't directed towards us even though it's about us. That was your defense on this stance, correct?[/QUOTE] Yes in this stitch. In others no. But i honestly wont take offense to what your coach said in your stitch if he says it once in his huddle. If he screams and yells it and makes a scene and hes showing us up then sure. But this was something just his team and I heard, I would give him the benefit of the doubt that he's frustrated, and attempting to coach. If he repeats then I will address him.
__________________
in OS I trust |
|
|||
Quote:
On defense in the 1st half, coach of Team B says to his players "move your feet, these refs are calling ticky-tack fouls on our end". This type of commentary continues a few more trips down the court. Again, not talking directly to us, but it is directed at us. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
in OS I trust |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Angry Coach | DeputyUICHousto | Softball | 23 | Wed Jul 09, 2008 08:04pm |
Another angry coach | shocker | Football | 7 | Wed Sep 24, 2003 12:57pm |
Angry Parent Comes to Officials Room | Rev.Ref63 | Basketball | 16 | Mon Jan 13, 2003 07:20pm |
Too Angry to Speak | rainmaker | Basketball | 2 | Mon Feb 18, 2002 02:12pm |
Now I'm ANGRY | mikesears | Basketball | 10 | Wed Jan 24, 2001 03:51pm |