Intentional Foul Situation

[joetip30]

This is something I saw missed in a game the other night and I wanted to doublecheck!

A2 is on break and has uncontested layup. B3 comes in and undercuts him violently, U1 calls intentional foul. A2 makes the layup in spite of contact.

I believe the correct call is one free throw for the foul, then A has the ball on the baseline for a spot throw in nearsest the foul? Am I correct?

Also,

B3 fouls A1. A1 swears at B3 during dead ball situation. R gives A1 a technical foul and it is A1's fifth personal. Now you have a false double foul situation. But the shooter on the original foul has just been disqualified.

Does the incoming sub shoot A1's free throws?

Then B team gets 2 Tech ft's and ball at division line?

Thanks!

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by joetip30

This is something I saw missed in a game the other night and I wanted to doublecheck!

A2 is on break and has uncontested layup. B3 comes in and undercuts him violently, U1 calls intentional foul. A2 makes the layup in spite of contact.

I believe the correct call is one free throw for the foul, then A has the ball on the baseline for a spot throw in nearsest the foul? Am I correct?

No, you are incorrect. The goal counts and the penalty for the intentional foul is TWO free throws plus the ball OOB at the nearest spot to the foul.

Originally Posted by joetip30

Also,

B3 fouls A1. A1 swears at B3 during dead ball situation. R gives A1 a technical foul and it is A1's fifth personal. Now you have a false double foul situation. But the shooter on the original foul has just been disqualified.

Does the incoming sub shoot A1's free throws?

Then B team gets 2 Tech ft's and ball at division line?

Thanks!

Correct.

[Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.]

If B3 "undercut" A2, I think that the L/U1 could have easily charged B3 with a flagrant personal foul in this play. Same penalty as an intentional foul per the number of free throws awarded, who shoots the free throws, and where Team A receives the ball for the throw-in after the free throws, except that B3 is disqualified for the remainder of the game for committing a flagrant foul.

MTD, Sr.

[JugglingReferee]

Originally Posted by joetip30

This is something I saw missed in a game the other night and I wanted to doublecheck!

A2 is on break and has uncontested layup. B3 comes in and undercuts him violently, U1 calls intentional foul. A2 makes the layup in spite of contact.

I believe the correct call is one free throw for the foul, then A has the ball on the baseline for a spot throw in nearsest the foul? Am I correct?

Also,

B3 fouls A1. A1 swears at B3 during dead ball situation. R gives A1 a technical foul and it is A1's fifth personal. Now you have a false double foul situation. But the shooter on the original foul has just been disqualified.

Does the incoming sub shoot A1's free throws?

Then B team gets 2 Tech ft's and ball at division line?

Thanks!

The penalty for an intentional foul is 2 shots + throw-in nearest the foul, no matter what happened to the try if a legal try had been attempted.

As to the foul, if it is a "violent undercut", why was he allowed to remain in the game?

Also,

Yes.

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

If B3 "undercut" A2, I think that the L/U1 could have easily charged B3 with a flagrant personal foul in this play.

I agree. Extremely dangerous play.

[joetip30]

Good question. I was just observing so I don't know the reasoning.

Thanks for the help.

[Mark Padgett]

Here's one for you newbies. A1 is shooting a three pointer. B1 fouls A1 intentionally and the intentional foul is called on the shot. The shot does not go in. How many free throws does A1 get, 2 or 3?

[newera21]

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett

Here's one for you newbies. A1 is shooting a three pointer. B1 fouls A1 intentionally and the intentional foul is called on the shot. The shot does not go in. How many free throws does A1 get, 2 or 3?

A1 gets three free throws with no players on the lane and play is resumed with a throw-in by Team A at the spot closest to the foul.

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by newera21

A1 gets three free throws with no players on the lane and play is resumed with a throw-in by Team A at the spot closest to the foul.

That is correct.

[IREFU2]

Originally Posted by mbyron

I agree. Extremely dangerous play.

I concur on this....he would have been tossed!!!!

[Ref_in_Alberta]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

No, you are incorrect. The goal counts and the penalty for the intentional foul is TWO free throws plus the ball OOB at the nearest spot to the foul.

FIBA rules... count the basket, ONE F.T. and the ball at the division line.

I agree though that a "violent undercut" should be an flagrent foul (Disqualifying Foul in FIBA terms)

[Rufus]

Originally Posted by tjones1

That is correct.

Would the rule reference be in the penalites for Rule 10, specifically penalty 5, which states:

Fouled in the act of shooting and try or tap is unsuccessful: two free throws on two-point try or tap, three free throws on three-point try or tap. Plus ball for throw-in if intentional or flagrant.

[tjones1]

Yes, also 4.19.3 Situation A.