The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 13, 2008, 05:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ohio, cincinnati
Posts: 813
Delayed Delayed violation?

The ball is at the disposal of free thrower A1. B1 steps into the
lane, and the official gives the delayed violation signal. A1 then
requests a timeout. When the team returns to the free throw after
the timeout, the official puts the ball at the disposal of A1 and
again gives the delayed violation signal. The free throw is missed
by A1, and the official awards a repeated free throw.
Correct?
__________________
New and improved: if it's new it's not improved; if it's improved it's not new.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 13, 2008, 05:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by OHBBREF View Post
The ball is at the disposal of free thrower A1. B1 steps into the
lane, and the official gives the delayed violation signal. A1 then
requests a timeout. When the team returns to the free throw after
the timeout, the official puts the ball at the disposal of A1 and
again gives the delayed violation signal. The free throw is missed
by A1, and the official awards a repeated free throw.
Correct?
I don't have any case to back it up but I would not give a substitute free throw. Once a time out is called, the ball becomes dead with the whistle thus the free throw has ended. After the timeout, the free throw is administered and the ball is made live again. I don't believe violations would carry over.

Just my opinion though. Great question

-Josh
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 13, 2008, 05:15pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
I belive there's a case play on this that states the violation is carried over. Otherwise, A1 pays for the timeout by freeing B1 from a penalty from a violation.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 13, 2008, 05:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,230
[QUOTE=Snaqwells;550418]I belive there's a case play on this that states the violation is carried over. Otherwise, A1 pays for the timeout by freeing B1 from a penalty from a violation.[/QUOTE

A1 should know that he has a substitute freethrow coming if he misses and should shoot the ball. I'm searching for a case play without much luck. I'm interested to see the result of this discussion

-Josh
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 13, 2008, 05:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,230
9.1.3 SITUATION C: A1 is preparing to attempt a free throw. Prior to A1’s
release of the ball, B1 fakes causing A2 to enter the lane prematurely. A1 then
requests and is granted a time-out. RULING: Upon resuming play, A1 is entitled
to a free throw and the official shall use the proper signal indicating a violation by B1 prior to the granting of the time-out. If the free throw is successful, the violation is ignored, if unsuccessful a substitute throw is awarded. (9-1-3b)


I stand corrected...hmmm

-Josh
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 13, 2008, 05:32pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdmara View Post
9.1.3 SITUATION C: A1 is preparing to attempt a free throw. Prior to A1’s
release of the ball, B1 fakes causing A2 to enter the lane prematurely. A1 then
requests and is granted a time-out. RULING: Upon resuming play, A1 is entitled
to a free throw and the official shall use the proper signal indicating a violation by B1 prior to the granting of the time-out. If the free throw is successful, the violation is ignored, if unsuccessful a substitute throw is awarded. (9-1-3b)


I stand corrected...hmmm

-Josh
I was just about to send you here. But you've already found it.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 13, 2008, 05:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ohio, cincinnati
Posts: 813
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdmara View Post
9.1.3 SITUATION C: A1 is preparing to attempt a free throw. Prior to A1’s
release of the ball, B1 fakes causing A2 to enter the lane prematurely. A1 then
requests and is granted a time-out. RULING: Upon resuming play, A1 is entitled
to a free throw and the official shall use the proper signal indicating a violation by B1 prior to the granting of the time-out. If the free throw is successful, the violation is ignored, if unsuccessful a substitute throw is awarded. (9-1-3b)


I stand corrected...hmmm

-Josh
You are correct but I do not believe that case play is the correct one,
This one actually comes from the NCAA case book

RULING: The official is correct. Even though a timeout was taken by
Team A, it does not negate the violation by B1.
(Rule 9-2.2.b)
When a violation is by the free-throwers opponent only:
b. When the try is not successful, the ball shall become dead when the free throw ends and a substitute free throw shall be attempted by the same free thrower under the same conditions as those of the original free throw.
__________________
New and improved: if it's new it's not improved; if it's improved it's not new.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 13, 2008, 05:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by OHBBREF View Post
You are correct but I do not believe that case play is the correct one,
This one actually comes from the NCAA case book

RULING: The official is correct. Even though a timeout was taken by
Team A, it does not negate the violation by B1.
(Rule 9-2.2.b)
When a violation is by the free-throwers opponent only:
b. When the try is not successful, the ball shall become dead when the free throw ends and a substitute free throw shall be attempted by the same free thrower under the same conditions as those of the original free throw.
So is this the FED interpretation as well?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 13, 2008, 05:50pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdmara View Post
9.1.3 SITUATION C: A1 is preparing to attempt a free throw. Prior to A1’s
release of the ball, B1 fakes causing A2 to enter the lane prematurely. A1 then
requests and is granted a time-out. RULING: Upon resuming play, A1 is entitled
to a free throw and the official shall use the proper signal indicating a violation by B1 prior to the granting of the time-out. If the free throw is successful, the violation is ignored, if unsuccessful a substitute throw is awarded. (9-1-3b)


I stand corrected...hmmm

-Josh
Josh, did you find this in the rule book or on the website?
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 13, 2008, 06:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
Josh, did you find this in the rule book or on the website?
2008-2009 Casebook page 67

-Josh
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 13, 2008, 06:11pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by OHBBREF View Post
You are correct but I do not believe that case play is the correct one,
This one actually comes from the NCAA case book

RULING: The official is correct. Even though a timeout was taken by
Team A, it does not negate the violation by B1.
(Rule 9-2.2.b)
When a violation is by the free-throwers opponent only:
b. When the try is not successful, the ball shall become dead when the free throw ends and a substitute free throw shall be attempted by the same free thrower under the same conditions as those of the original free throw.
Why don't you think it's the correct case play?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ajs8207 View Post
So is this the FED interpretation as well?
Yes, it's the same in FED.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdmara View Post
2008-2009 Casebook page 67

-Josh
Thanks, Josh.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 13, 2008, 08:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In a little pink house
Posts: 5,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdmara View Post
I don't have any case to back it up but I would not give a substitute free throw. Once a time out is called, the ball becomes dead with the whistle thus the free throw has ended. After the timeout, the free throw is administered and the ball is made live again. I don't believe violations would carry over.

Just my opinion though. Great question

-Josh
Although there are some specific rules that permit taking a time out to "buy" a player back into the game (for blood or injury), the granting of a time out never uncalls any violation or foul nor does it ever cancel any penalty.

I have occasionally seen posts here that tried to say that if the defense violates on a free throw it's not a violation unless the shot is missed. That is absolutely not true. When B1 stepped into the lane, he violated. The penalty for that violation includes waiting to see if the free thrower makes the shot. If he does, "the violation is disregarded" (NFHS 9-1 Penalties 2-a)

There's nothing about granting a time out that undoes B1's violation, nor does it set aside the penalty. It merely delays the enforcement of the penalty for 30 or 60 seconds.
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 13, 2008, 08:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,995
Quote:
Originally Posted by Back In The Saddle View Post
Although there are some specific rules that permit taking a time out to "buy" a player back into the game (for blood or injury), the granting of a time out never uncalls any violation or foul nor does it ever cancel any penalty.

I have occasionally seen posts here that tried to say that if the defense violates on a free throw it's not a violation unless the shot is missed. That is absolutely not true. When B1 stepped into the lane, he violated. The penalty for that violation includes waiting to see if the free thrower makes the shot. If he does, "the violation is disregarded" (NFHS 9-1 Penalties 2-a)

There's nothing about granting a time out that undoes B1's violation, nor does it set aside the penalty. It merely delays the enforcement of the penalty for 30 or 60 seconds.
I wonder if BadNewsRef would insist that the violation occurs when the thrower's attempt is unsuccessful.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 14, 2008, 08:18am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
I wonder if BadNewsRef would insist that the violation occurs when the thrower's attempt is unsuccessful.
Apples and oranges, but nice try.

If we ever get a "delayed travel" mechanic then we can revisit.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR

Last edited by Raymond; Fri Nov 14, 2008 at 08:31am.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 14, 2008, 11:14am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ohio, cincinnati
Posts: 813
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
Why don't you think it's the correct case play?
Because If A2 steps in the lane you have an offensive violation and the violation is called immediately
However you are penalizing the fake by B2 that cuased the violation,
I do not think you delay the throw until after A1 shoots.
__________________
New and improved: if it's new it's not improved; if it's improved it's not new.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Delayed lane violation mechanic by Lead. mick Basketball 4 Fri Mar 28, 2008 08:56pm
Signaling Delayed FT Violation Rick Durkee Basketball 16 Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:12am
Horn on FT - delayed violation? bgtg19 Basketball 7 Thu Jan 20, 2005 04:17pm
Super delayed Violation JamieSlick Basketball 13 Sat Dec 08, 2001 06:44pm
Delayed Free Throw Violation CanadaRef Basketball 19 Thu Nov 08, 2001 11:22am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1