The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 12, 2007, 09:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Winchester, NH
Posts: 184
Question Signaling Delayed FT Violation

While the ball is at the disposal of the thrower during a free throw, the trail official sees a lane violation by a player on team B. It seems to me that the official should give the Delay Violation signal with the hand farther from the end line? If that's true, should she/he also continue the wrist flick count with his arm extended? Is there another way to do it?
__________________
Insert cool signature line here!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 12, 2007, 09:26pm
PYRef
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If I'm not mistaken, he 10 second free throw count should not be a visible count. Therefore there would be no wrist flick to interfere with the delayed violation signal.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 12, 2007, 09:34pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by PYRef
If I'm not mistaken, he 10 second free throw count should not be a visible count.
You're mistaken. The 10-second count is a visible wrist flick. 240(f) on p.41 of the NFHS Officials Manual.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 12, 2007, 10:25pm
Aleve Titles to Others
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East Westchester of the Southern Conference
Posts: 5,381
Send a message via AIM to 26 Year Gap
Most of the time, the defense violates AFTER the FT release, so you could use the arm furthest from the hoop to signal the delayed violation. If it happens before the release, why couldn't you just stop the count on the release and go right into the delayed violation signal with the same arm?
__________________
Never hit a piņata if you see hornets flying out of it.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 13, 2007, 12:19am
(Something hilarious)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: These United States
Posts: 1,162
Quote:
Originally Posted by 26 Year Gap
Most of the time, the defense violates AFTER the FT release, so you could use the arm furthest from the hoop to signal the delayed violation. If it happens before the release, why couldn't you just stop the count on the release and go right into the delayed violation signal with the same arm?
Because, theoretically, you could still have a violation on the shooter for violating the 10-second rule, in which case you'd penalize both violations. (9-1-Penalties-4-b.)
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 13, 2007, 02:11am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,557
Personally, I'd just stop counting, never really thought about it. Anyways I don't really count to begin with...
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 13, 2007, 03:26am
PYRef
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
You're mistaken. The 10-second count is a visible wrist flick. 240(f) on p.41 of the NFHS Officials Manual.
I stand corrected.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 13, 2007, 04:44am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Durkee
While the ball is at the disposal of the thrower during a free throw, the trail official sees a lane violation by a player on team B. It seems to me that the official should give the Delay Violation signal with the hand farther from the end line? If that's true, should she/he also continue the wrist flick count with his arm extended? Is there another way to do it?
I hope that you are asking about 2-man officiating.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 13, 2007, 09:15am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Durkee
It seems to me that the official should give the Delay Violation signal with the hand farther from the end line? If that's true, should she/he also continue the wrist flick count with his arm extended? Is there another way to do it?
Count with the hand farther from the end-line. Raise that hand when the FT is in the air and be ready to chop the time. Signal the delayed violation with the other hand.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 14, 2007, 07:30pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 22,952
Nonvisible Count

I believe that the only nonvisible count is the three-second count. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Last edited by BillyMac; Wed Feb 14, 2007 at 08:39pm.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 14, 2007, 10:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 275
The reason you don't stop

If the free throw is successful, you have no violation (assuming A is shooing and B has violated the lane).
__________________
Damain
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 15, 2007, 12:54am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkeyeCubP
Because, theoretically, you could still have a violation on the shooter for violating the 10-second rule, in which case you'd penalize both violations. (9-1-Penalties-4-b.)
Is it true that a lane violation committed by a player on the non-shooting team (9-1-9) isn't a violation until the ball leaves the thrower's hands? If so, if the thrower commits a 10 second violation (9-1-3) that violation causes the ball to become dead so there would not be a dual violation/penalty.

??
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 15, 2007, 01:09am
(Something hilarious)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: These United States
Posts: 1,162
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmaellis
Is it true that a lane violation committed by a player on the non-shooting team (9-1-9) isn't a violation until the ball leaves the thrower's hands? If so, if the thrower commits a 10 second violation (9-1-3) that violation causes the ball to become dead so there would not be a dual violation/penalty.

??
An opponent of the shooter violating a free-throw provision/requirement/rule is a violation as soon as it occurs, provided the ball is at the shooter's disposal. If the free throw is made, the violation is ignored. - Hence the delayed dead ball signal as soon as the violation occurs - not when the ball is released for the free throw (if the one precedes the other).
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 15, 2007, 09:27am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lakewood, Ohio
Posts: 718
I would signal with my hand towards the backcourt. I would silently continue the count with my nearer hand. If the shooter violates, he gets a re-shoot due to the delayed violation.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 15, 2007, 09:37am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac
I believe that the only nonvisible count is the three-second count. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
True for FED and NCAAM. In NCAAW, the 10-second FT count is also "non visibile", and of course, there is no 10-second bcacckurt count.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[FIBA] About signaling valid basket... QuebecRef87 Basketball 10 Fri Jan 27, 2006 06:47pm
Horn on FT - delayed violation? bgtg19 Basketball 7 Thu Jan 20, 2005 04:17pm
Umpire Signaling TD mcrowder Football 36 Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:13am
Super delayed Violation JamieSlick Basketball 13 Sat Dec 08, 2001 06:44pm
Delayed Free Throw Violation CanadaRef Basketball 19 Thu Nov 08, 2001 11:22am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:01am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1