The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 05, 2001, 01:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 21
Question

This was one of our test questions this year in Canada; NCAA rules with modifications that don't matter in this post. Team A is shooting free throws. B1, on the lane closest to the hoop, steps in early. Delayed violation. A1 (shooter) calls a timeout. Does the delayed violation carry over to after the timeout has expired? Said another way, does A1 get another shot after the timeout if he misses the free throw? Test answer said it does, but I can't find the ruling anywhere in the NCAA rulebook. Your comments would be appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 05, 2001, 01:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 451
yes the violation is carried over after the t.o. very dumb rule i think.
__________________
tony
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 05, 2001, 01:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 87
Quote:
Originally posted by JamieSlick
This was one of our test questions this year in Canada; NCAA rules with modifications that don't matter in this post. Team A is shooting free throws. B1, on the lane closest to the hoop, steps in early. Delayed violation. A1 (shooter) calls a timeout. Does the delayed violation carry over to after the timeout has expired? Said another way, does A1 get another shot after the timeout if he misses the free throw? Test answer said it does, but I can't find the ruling anywhere in the NCAA rulebook. Your comments would be appreciated.
My test hasn't been corrected yet, but after reading your post it looks like I got it wrong. I searched everywhere in the book too and found nothing. My reasoning for answering NO was "if A1 misses and we give him a substitute throw, nobody in the gym (other than my partners) will understand what is going on. Coach B goes nuts and Coach A is confused but certainly doesn't say anything". It just doesn't seem right.

Hopefully someone can find a reference. I know many others who are confused with this question as well. We can't seem to get an interpretation.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 05, 2001, 02:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 21
Talking

The funny thing about this post is that I have NEVER actually seen this situation happen, which makes it a certainty that it will be asked on a test!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 05, 2001, 02:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 9,105
Send a message via AIM to ChuckElias
Super delayed violation

A "super delayed violation"? Is that anything like "secret double probation"? If so, it must be time for a. . . ROAD TRIP!!

Chuck
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 05, 2001, 02:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 21
Talking

Animal house ,right? I think it's double secret probation!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 05, 2001, 02:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
This question keeps popping up. Yes, under NF and NCAA rules, the violation is still in force. There was post about this sitch several weeks ago. Click on the link below.

http://www.officialforum.com/thread/3152
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 05, 2001, 02:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 87
OK, let's get nuts!

Let's take this to an even higher level of improbability...

So B1 violates and A calls time out. So we know that A1 gets a substitute throw if he misses. Before the ball becomes live for A1's first throw, A2 is assesed with a direct tecnical foul. After B shoots two free throws, they decide they want a time out. I could go on with other interruptions but you see where I'm going with this, right? It could be 5 minutes before A1 gets to shoot his original free throw. He misses. We give him a substitute throw. Coach B wants an explanation: "Sure coach, don't you remember 5 minutes ago when your player violated on A1's free throw and then he called a time out instead of taking the free throw?"

Jamie, maybe this will be on next year's test. And yes it is "double secret probation"

Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 05, 2001, 03:11pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Re: OK, let's get nuts!

Quote:
Originally posted by JeffRef
Let's take this to an even higher level of improbability...

So B1 violates and A calls time out. So we know that A1 gets a substitute throw if he misses. Before the ball becomes live for A1's first throw, A2 is assesed with a direct tecnical foul. After B shoots two free throws, they decide they want a time out. I could go on with other interruptions but you see where I'm going with this, right? It could be 5 minutes before A1 gets to shoot his original free throw. He misses. We give him a substitute throw. Coach B wants an explanation: "Sure coach, don't you remember 5 minutes ago when your player violated on A1's free throw and then he called a time out instead of taking the free throw?"

Jamie, maybe this will be on next year's test. And yes it is "double secret probation"

Look at it this way.I don't think anything can come between you having to call the delayed B1 violation and awarding a substitute throw if the FT is missed,except an A violation of some kind on the FT.Time lapse doesn't matter.

[Edited by Jurassic Referee on Dec 5th, 2001 at 02:14 PM]
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 05, 2001, 03:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 87
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
This question keeps popping up. Yes, under NF and NCAA rules, the violation is still in force. There was post about this sitch several weeks ago. Click on the link below.

http://www.officialforum.com/thread/3152
Thanks Tony. I didn't realize we beat this one to death already.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 05, 2001, 03:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Re: Re: OK, let's get nuts!

Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Look at it this way.I don't think anything can come between you having to call the delayed B1 violation and awarding a substitute throw if the FT is missed,except an A violation of some kind on the FT.Time lapse doesn't matter.
You have to remember that we're talking NCAA. They have that funky rule where the FTs are not shot in the order in which the fouls occur.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 05, 2001, 03:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 9,105
Send a message via AIM to ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by JamieSlick
Animal house ,right? I think it's double secret probation!
Yes, it's Animal House, and of course you're right. I'm sure it's "double secret probation" and not secret double. Darn it.

Chuck
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 05, 2001, 04:07pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Re: Re: Re: OK, let's get nuts!

Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Look at it this way.I don't think anything can come between you having to call the delayed B1 violation and awarding a substitute throw if the FT is missed,except an A violation of some kind on the FT.Time lapse doesn't matter.
You have to remember that we're talking NCAA. They have that funky rule where the FTs are not shot in the order in which the fouls occur.
Tony,if a T in NCAA is called before you shoot the FT with the delayed violation,don't they shoot the T,then go back to the original FT that had the B1 violation?Wouldn't we end up the same as I said above?
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Sat Dec 08, 2001, 06:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 21
Cool

Thanks for the help everyone. Sorry to beat this to death; didn't realize it was posted previously!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:24am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1