|
|||
Lane Violation
Ran across a scenario I have never seen in 10 years of officiating & not sure how it should have been handled. I have not checked the case book, but want to see what some of your thoughts are on the ruling. Here you go ...
A1 shooting 2nd of 2 FTs. B1 steps in lane early. A1 shoots and goes in lane early. A1 makes the basket. So, we have a delayed violation on B1. However, when offense violates, it is immediate whistle. Do you blow it dead & re-shoot because defense violated first? Do you blow it dead & count basket because defense violated? Do you hold whistle & count FT? This was game 4 of 5 in a long day of kids AAU ball. We just went double violation, possession arrow & moved forward. We talked later & the 3 of us could not agree on "proper" handling of situation. Thoughts ... |
|
|||
Quote:
Last edited by Jurassic Referee; Fri Jun 16, 2006 at 05:20pm. |
|
|||
As JR told you, you did get it right. I'm stunned that this would spark a discussion for three officials. It is a simple rule.
Just remember that if BOTH violations are by players along the lane, then only the first one is penalized. If there is a violation by the defense along the lane followed by a violation by the shooter or a teammate of his who is OUTSIDE the 3 pt line/FT line extended, then both are penalized. In this case you always do as JR said and cancel the FT if it was made and determine possession by the AP arrow. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
lane violation | I love this game | Basketball | 17 | Tue Dec 07, 2004 03:08pm |
Lane Violation? | Grail | Basketball | 2 | Sat Nov 20, 2004 08:34pm |
1 &1 w/lane violation | gostars | Basketball | 1 | Thu Nov 11, 2004 12:12pm |
Lane violation | batreferee | Basketball | 2 | Wed Dec 17, 2003 04:07pm |
Lane violation or not | D.Hosler | Basketball | 11 | Wed Feb 09, 2000 06:46pm |