Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by Nate1224hoops
Also, I dont,and I am not sure about the site, appreciate you telling me what I am ready for. If you would read the entire post, I said from the outset that it is a foul. However, I choose to see a little more in the situation than the words on the page. Taking shots at posters is very low. Just dont reply to what I have to say if you cant give advice. I'd rather not hear your attitude. Thanks
|
No one has taken a shot at you. We gave you advice, and you disagreed with that. We pointed out why we gave the advice you did. You started talking about "rulebookers". We again disagreed with your interp of a sitch, and you think we're shooting at you?
This doesn't have to be a flame war, but you need to find a way to disagree without it getting into an insult fest. We can disagree about judgement without calling each other "rulebookers" and so on.
Some of us disagree with you. It happens. Why is that a problem?
|
LOL...I agree totally. First off, I called no one person a rule booker. I said that I feel that some officials do not see the situation, they only see the citation. I dont know anyone personlly or their style; therefore, I would never say anything like that. Dan however did take a shot at me. He told me that if I werent ready to make the calls...of course that HE feels I should make...that maybe I shouldnt officiate. That is a shot.
We can agree to disagree. You make it sound as though you offered advice and I disagreed. I agreed. I also stated that there is more that just words in a rule book to be considered.
Thu Oct 27, 2005, 02:09pm
Threaded Mode
