FTs shot in wrong order - correctable

[bucky]

Sure we have discussed. Can't find it.

A1 is shooting and gets hit by B1. Foul is called and B1 slams ball. One official does not realize that A1 was shooting and administers the technical foul FTs. After the FT's, the officials discuss and decide indeed, A1 was shooting.

FT's were shot in wrong order. Is there a case play some place that indicates this falls under correctable errors? I do not think case play exists but want to confirm with the forum.

[SNIPERBBB]

Order of free throws isnt a CE.

[ilyazhito]

This is not a correctable error. Because the merited free throws were awarded to the correct players, they would count. The only correction involved would be clearing the lane for the out-of-order personal foul free throws, and awarding possession to Team A at the division line opposite the table per the technical foul rules.

[Camron Rust]

This was a correctable error....failure to award merited FTs to A1. After shooting the FTs for the T, you discussed it, realizing A1 was not given the merited FTs, and corrected the error by awarding A1 the FTs that were merited but not shot when they should have been.

If you had simply shot them out of order thinking that it was the right way to do it and realized later that the order was wrong, that wouldn't be a correctable error....case 8.6.2B.

So, the wrong order itself isn't a correctable error, but realizing A1 didn't get FTs that should have been given is a correctable error.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

If you had simply shot them out of order thinking that it was the right way to do it and realized later that the order was wrong, that wouldn't be a correctable error....case 8.6.2B.

Nice citation Camron Rust.

8.6.2 SITUATION B: B1 fouls A1 just as the first quarter ends and then A1 retaliates and intentionally contacts B1. A1’s foul is a technical foul as it occurred during a dead ball. Team A is in the bonus. The officials by mistake administer the penalty for the technical foul before the free throw(s) by A1. RULING: The penalties should have been administered in the order in which the fouls occurred. However, since all merited free throws were attempted it does not constitute a correctable error situation. The second quarter will begin with an alternating-possession throw-in. (4-19-5c)

[WhistlesAndStripes]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Nice citation Camron Rust.



8.6.2 SITUATION B: B1 fouls A1 just as the first quarter ends and then A1 retaliates and intentionally contacts B1. A1’s foul is a technical foul as it occurred during a dead ball. Team A is in the bonus. The officials by mistake administer the penalty for the technical foul before the free throw(s) by A1. RULING: The penalties should have been administered in the order in which the fouls occurred. However, since all merited free throws were attempted it does not constitute a correctable error situation. The second quarter will begin with an alternating-possession throw-in. (4-19-5c)

In the case play cited, if you shoot the FTs In the correct order(bonus and then technical), do you then administer the throw-in to start the second quarter based on the technical foul, or the AP arrow?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by WhistlesAndStripes

In the case play cited, if you shoot the FTs In the correct order(bonus and then technical), do you then administer the throw-in to start the second quarter based on the technical foul, or the AP arrow?

Hint 1: Can part of a penalty carry over from one quarter to the next?

Hint 2; WTF difference does it make (for this question) in what order the FTs were shot?

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Nice citation Camron Rust.

8.6.2 SITUATION B: B1 fouls A1 just as the first quarter ends and then A1 retaliates and intentionally contacts B1. A1’s foul is a technical foul as it occurred during a dead ball. Team A is in the bonus. The officials by mistake administer the penalty for the technical foul before the free throw(s) by A1. RULING: The penalties should have been administered in the order in which the fouls occurred. However, since all merited free throws were attempted it does not constitute a correctable error situation. The second quarter will begin with an alternating-possession throw-in. (4-19-5c)

Curiously, in which quarter A1’s technical foul takes place is fully dependent upon the number of fouls Team B committed during the first quarter! If they have six or fewer, A1’s T starts the second quarter. I find it strange that when to penalize A1 depends upon the foul count of the opposing team.

[BigCat]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Curiously, in which quarter A1’s technical foul takes place is fully dependent upon the number of fouls Team B committed during the first quarter! If they have six or fewer, A1’s T starts the second quarter. I find it strange that when to penalize A1 depends upon the foul count of the opposing team.

Yes, I put it in the “is what is” category. Qtr has beginning and end. If it’s 7th team foul there are free throws to be shot because of 1st qtr foul. Just the rule. If only 6 then ball dead and nothing left to do then T. Qtr really is over. I wouldn’t mind seeing them carry over the T throwin on cases where qtr hasn’t ended because of FTs. I think it’s more a product of saying when a qtr ends..If any of that makes sense...

[MattReferee]

Originally Posted by ilyazhito

this is not a correctable error. Because the merited free throws were awarded to the correct players, they would count. The only correction involved would be clearing the lane for the out-of-order personal foul free throws, and awarding possession to team a at the division line opposite the table per the technical foul rules.

👏🏀👍🏻