Violation???

[BayStateRef]

As noted, 9-2-11 says no teammate of the thrower shall be out of bounds after a designated-spot throw-in begins. Penalty is ball awarded OOB at the original throw-in spot.

BUT....
it is a legal throw-in when a pass is caught by a teammate OOB. It is an OOB violation (and not a throw-in violation) and the new throw-in will be at the OOB spot where the pass was caught, not the original throw-in spot.

So...
If a teammate catches the ball while OOB, it seems he has violated the provision that says no teammate shall be OOB after a spot throw-in starts.

How do we reconcile these seemingly conflicting rules?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by BayStateRef

As noted, 9-2-11 says no teammate of the thrower shall be out of bounds after a designated-spot throw-in begins. Penalty is ball awarded OOB at the original throw-in spot.

BUT....
it is a legal throw-in when a pass is caught by a teammate OOB. It is an OOB violation (and not a throw-in violation) and the new throw-in will be at the OOB spot where the pass was caught, not the original throw-in spot.

So...
If a teammate catches the ball while OOB, it seems he has violated the provision that says no teammate shall be OOB after a spot throw-in starts.

How do we reconcile these seemingly conflicting rules?

By recognizing that the former is meant to address the situation where the inbounding team tries to switch inbounders, or act as if it's a "run the endline" type of play and fake (or make) a throw to someone else on the endline.

The latter is for the "normal" type of OOB violation.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by BayStateRef

9-2-11 says no teammate of the thrower shall be out of bounds after a designated-spot throw-in begins.

When does this restriction (above) end?

Probably when the throwin ends, but there are other ending times for restrictions within the throwin rules:

The throw-in ends when:
a. The passed ball touches or is touched by another player inbounds.
b. The passed ball touches or is touched by another player out-of-bounds.

The thrower shall not leave the designated throw-in spot until
the ball has been released on a throw-in pass.

The thrown ball shall not be touched by a teammate of the
thrower while the ball is on the out-of-bounds side of the throw-in
boundary-line plane.

Nit picking? Guilty as charged. Consider it a written test situation.

[bucky]

Originally Posted by Raymond

Either you have a citation or you don't.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Either you can read or you can't.

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Please stop being a tease, I knew a lot of girls in high school like that (I watched Breakfast Club on television last night).

Thank you.

I saw that and nearly stayed up to watch Pretty in Pink which followed.

Originally Posted by BayStateRef

So...
If a teammate catches the ball while OOB, it seems he has violated the provision that says no teammate shall be OOB after a spot throw-in starts.

How do we reconcile these seemingly conflicting rules?

I do not feel that the provision was violated. When the ball is at the disposal of the thrower, a teammate could not be OOB (with one case play exception) as that would constitute leaving the court for an unauthorized reason. Now, during the throw-in, the teammate could end up (via say push or momentum) OOB. I do not see what there is to reconcile.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by bucky

Either you can read or you can't.



I saw that and nearly stayed up to watch Pretty in Pink which ....

As usual you have nothing concrete, just a bunch word games. Great contribution to the conversation, you really cleared up that rule for the OP.

[bucky]

Originally Posted by Raymond

As usual you have nothing concrete, just a bunch word games. Great contribution to the conversation, you really cleared up that rule for the OP.

The OP was cleared up with the first response..although maybe you did not read that part.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by bucky

The OP was cleared up with the first response..although maybe you did not read that part.

The original poster (OP) asked a follow-up question, which I answered with rules references that you said were not accurate, but you never provided the citation showing I was wrong.

So as I said, you have contributed nothing this conversation except a bunch of ballbusting.

Now back to the famous "faking to the face" throw-in case play that you'll never answer in the other thread.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

bucky, I'm waiting with bated breath. Please stop being a tease, I knew a lot of girls in high school like that (I watched Breakfast Club on television last night).

Originally Posted by bucky

I saw that and nearly stayed up to watch Pretty in Pink which followed.

Molly Ringwald or Ally Sheedy?

[bucky]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Molly Ringwald or Ally Sheedy?

Easy..Sheedy of course.

[WhistlesAndStripes]

Originally Posted by bucky

I do not feel that the provision was violated.

The facts don’t care about your feelings. — Ben Shapiro


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk