Foul on 1 and 1 freethrow

[bob jenkins]

That all sounds correct, except that since the original FT was the front end of a 1-1, then the foul on the shooter must also result in FTs -- either a 1-1 or 2. No thorw-in here. (THe concept is correct, however)

[johnsonboys03]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

That all sounds correct, except that since the original FT was the front end of a 1-1, then the foul on the shooter must also result in FTs -- either a 1-1 or 2. No thorw-in here. (THe concept is correct, however)

Thanks Bob. I did intend on writing that but didn't realize I didn't. Thanks so much for the help

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

That all sounds correct, except that since the original FT was the front end of a 1-1, then the foul on the shooter must also result in FTs -- either a 1-1 or 2. No thorw-in here. (THe concept is correct, however)

No true. Check the NFHS play rulings issued last year.

This would not be a foul during the act of shooting. It is a common foul, which could result in bonus FTs or a throw-in.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

No true. Check the NFHS play rulings issued last year.

This would not be a foul during the act of shooting. It is a common foul, which could result in bonus FTs or a throw-in.

If A1 is shooting the first shot of 1-and-1, how could any foul on Team B not be 1-and-1 or a 2-shot bonus in this situation?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

This would not be a foul during the act of shooting. It is a common foul, which could result in bonus FTs or a throw-in.

As a general statement, I agree. In this specific instance, where Team A is already in the bonus, then Team A will continue to be in the bonus after the next foul.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

As a general statement, I agree. In this specific instance, where Team A is already in the bonus, then Team A will continue to be in the bonus after the next foul.

And now I see the light! Your logic was exquisite in that scenario.

I was stuck in the general case and failed to comprehend the specific situation.