![]() |
|
|||
Sorry, I meant 6-4-5, which says, "The opportunity to make an AP throw-in is lost if the throw-in team violates. . . . If the defensive team commits a violation during the throw-in, the possession arrow is not switched."
So, even if the word "legally" is removed from 4-42-5a, what 6-4-5 says means everything is the same as it's always been. I prefer that they had left the word "legally" there, but someone must have said, "Hey, since 6-4-5 covers this eventuality, let's just remove this word." Duh. Does that make sense to you?
__________________
Making Every Effort to Be in the Right Place at the Right Time, Looking at the Right Thing to Make the Right Call |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Revised Brain Teaser | MD Longhorn | Football | 15 | Fri Aug 13, 2010 10:42pm |
Revised: First, Osborne; Second, Christensen | Carl Childress | Baseball | 14 | Tue Oct 18, 2005 11:42am |
NFHS OBS Revised Rule | whiskers_ump | Softball | 4 | Tue Dec 14, 2004 11:26pm |
revised question on penalty during touchdown | timharris | Football | 8 | Fri Aug 13, 2004 09:59am |
Revised 2nd situation, check swing 4th out. | BJ Moose | Baseball | 13 | Fri Jan 19, 2001 11:27am |