Continuous Motion/Traveling - The Official Forum

#7 (permalink)

Fri Sep 04, 2015, 01:33pm

so cal lurker so cal lurker is offline

Official Forum Member

Join Date: Apr 2010

Posts: 734

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

By rule, in both (1) and (2) the FGA does not count and we award two FTs. But the foul in (2) and always bothered me because A1 traveled not of his own volition as in (1) but because of B1's foul and CM does not allow for any distinction between the two.

Just some food for thought.

MTD, Sr.

I think it would become awfully hard (and controversial) for refs to have to decide if the travel was "caused" by the foul.

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is On Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Continuous Motion	Toren	Basketball	12	Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:55am
Continuous Motion?	Reffing Rev.	Basketball	26	Fri Dec 18, 2009 08:10am
Continuous Motion or Not	Sven	Basketball	3	Sun Dec 04, 2005 11:48am
Continuous Motion	ronny mulkey	Basketball	20	Sun Dec 28, 2003 03:01pm
continuous motion	Ralph Stubenthal	Basketball	1	Thu Nov 01, 2001 09:48pm

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:42pm.