The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 28, 2010, 11:33am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 7
batting out of order 2

Hi,
This did'nt happen in my game but another umpire told me it happened in his game. OBR rules
Batters 1 and 3 get reversed
1) B1 gets on base
2) B2 gets on base
3) B3 comes to plate no pitch thrown yet
then scorekeeper raises the question that B1 and B3 are switched

How would you get this cleaned up?
or
Since B2 made B1 legal,does the order stay as is?

I tried to find a scenario in the BOO section of the rule book but I can't really find anything to cover this BOO.

WilliamK
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 28, 2010, 12:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamK View Post
Hi,
This did'nt happen in my game but another umpire told me it happened in his game. OBR rules
Batters 1 and 3 get reversed
1) B1 gets on base
2) B2 gets on base
3) B3 comes to plate no pitch thrown yet
then scorekeeper raises the question that B1 and B3 are switched

How would you get this cleaned up?
or
Since B2 made B1 legal,does the order stay as is?

I tried to find a scenario in the BOO section of the rule book but I can't really find anything to cover this BOO.

WilliamK
Seems to me that B2 is now Out of Turn since B1 who is #3 on the line up is now legal.
B4 should be out on appeal since he should have been the proper batter.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 28, 2010, 12:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,458
What you do is tell the scorekeeper to shut up, and let the game continue.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 28, 2010, 01:06pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamK View Post
Hi,
This did'nt happen in my game but another umpire told me it happened in his game. OBR rules
Batters 1 and 3 get reversed
1) B1 gets on base
2) B2 gets on base
3) B3 comes to plate no pitch thrown yet
then scorekeeper raises the question that B1 and B3 are switched

How would you get this cleaned up?
or
Since B2 made B1 legal,does the order stay as is?

I tried to find a scenario in the BOO section of the rule book but I can't really find anything to cover this BOO.

WilliamK
The nomenclature here is messy. Assuming you meant the following... Proper lineup is Abel, Baker, Charlie, Daffy, Ed...

Charlie bats (when Abel should have) and gets on base.
Baker bats and gets on base. Once a pitch was thrown to Baker, Charlie is legal... making the proper batter right now Daffy.
Abel comes to the plate - an appeal on BOO right now would have Daffy out for not batting, and Ed up to bat next.

Although the actual correct answer here was supplied by kyle. Unless this is appealed BY A COACH, play on. Scorekeepers are fans and bystanders. If Abel is pitched to, Baker becomes legal and assuming Charlie is still on base, Daffy is brought to the plate.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 28, 2010, 01:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: illinois
Posts: 251
Kyle is correct to shut the scorekeeper up, but if coach appeals...

pg. 56 rule 6.07 at the bottom of approved ruling..


RULING: When the proper batter is on base, he is passed over, and the following batter becomes the proper batter

So B4 hits, (the real B1 doesnt hit, nor is he out) and next time around the order would go back to whats on line up card.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 28, 2010, 01:16pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by umpjong View Post
Kyle is correct to shut the scorekeeper up, but if coach appeals...

pg. 56 rule 6.07 at the bottom of approved ruling..


RULING: When the proper batter is on base, he is passed over, and the following batter becomes the proper batter

So B4 hits, (the real B1 doesnt hit, nor is he out) and next time around the order would go back to whats on line up card.
Incorrect for the OP. B4 is out for not batting after B3, B5 is up.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 28, 2010, 01:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
Incorrect for the OP. B4 is out for not batting after B3, B5 is up.
Agree, but you forgot to take a runner off the bases. Let's stick with Able, Baker, etc.

Charlie bats first and reaches base.

Baker bats next, and the first pitch to him makes Charlie's at-bat proper. Baker reaches base.

The OP says that Able comes up next and the scorekeeper announces BOO before a pitch to him. (I agree with the consensus to shut up the scorekeeper.)

If a coach appeals at this point, he's right on time. The proper second batter was not Baker but Danny. So:

1. Danny, the proper batter for the spot where Baker batted, is out.
2. Remove Baker from base, but he's not out.
3. If Charlie's advance was due to Baker's at bat (not from a wild pitch, steal, etc.), he returns to 1B.
4. Since Danny made the last out, the next batter is Eddy.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 28, 2010, 02:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: illinois
Posts: 251
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
Agree, but you forgot to take a runner off the bases. Let's stick with Able, Baker, etc.

Charlie bats first and reaches base.

Baker bats next, and the first pitch to him makes Charlie's at-bat proper. Baker reaches base.

The OP says that Able comes up next and the scorekeeper announces BOO before a pitch to him. (I agree with the consensus to shut up the scorekeeper.)

If a coach appeals at this point, he's right on time. The proper second batter was not Baker but Danny. So:

1. Danny, the proper batter for the spot where Baker batted, is out.
2. Remove Baker from base, but he's not out.
3. If Charlie's advance was due to Baker's at bat (not from a wild pitch, steal, etc.), he returns to 1B.
4. Since Danny made the last out, the next batter is Eddy.
This correct, my reply is only correct if there is a pitch to the third batter in OP, there was not so this, above, is correct...
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 28, 2010, 02:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by umpjong View Post
This correct, my reply is only correct if there is a pitch to the third batter in OP, there was not so this, above, is correct...
If they throw a pitch to Able, then Baker's at bat is made proper and the next batter should be Charlie. But since Charlie is on base, the proper batter would be Danny.

If Able is at the plate, he gets to sit, and Danny comes to the plate and inherits Able's count (1-0 or 0-1 after one pitch). Nobody's out in this situation, and no runners are removed; the coach was 1 pitch too late to appeal BOO.

I think that's what you said.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 28, 2010, 04:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
The nomenclature here is messy. Assuming you meant the following... Proper lineup is Abel, Baker, Charlie, Daffy, Ed...

Charlie bats (when Abel should have) and gets on base.
Baker bats and gets on base. Once a pitch was thrown to Baker, Charlie is legal... making the proper batter right now Daffy.
Abel comes to the plate - an appeal on BOO right now would have Daffy out for not batting, and Ed up to bat next.

.
No. If the appeal is while Abel is at the plate you just replace him with Daffy who assumes the count.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 28, 2010, 05:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Ives View Post
No. If the appeal is while Abel is at the plate you just replace him with Daffy who assumes the count.
Not before Abel has taken a pitch, which is what I was referring to (as was the OP).
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 28, 2010, 09:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
Not before Abel has taken a pitch, which is what I was referring to (as was the OP).
I guess I don't grasp your point. Daffy has become the proper batter. Therefore as long as he's put up to bat at any time before Abel or Charlie (or Smith for that matter) completes the current slot's AB things are Kosher. mbyron made the same point.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 28, 2010, 10:11pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 469
Rich,

I think the issue is that Baker was now BOO because Charlie is now legal. An appeal prior to a pitch to Abel would have Danny called out (b/c of Baker's BOO) and Ed up to bat - Baker removed from the bases, Charlie returned to his previous base. Abel doesn't come into the play (until a pitch is delivered to him).

Last edited by ManInBlue; Tue Sep 28, 2010 at 10:21pm.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 28, 2010, 11:16pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by ManInBlue View Post
Rich,

I think the issue is that Baker was now BOO because Charlie is now legal. An appeal prior to a pitch to Abel would have Danny called out (b/c of Baker's BOO) and Ed up to bat - Baker removed from the bases, Charlie returned to his previous base. Abel doesn't come into the play (until a pitch is delivered to him).
Got what you meant now.

The Order was A, B, C, D, E, F

They batted C, B and both got on base. But as the pitch to B legitimized C, D was the real proper batter due up, not B.

If you appeal immediately, D (the proper batter) is out, B is removed from the bases, C returns, E should be up.

If A goes to the plate and a pitch is delivered, then B is legitimized, C should be up but he's on base, so D is up. And because the at bat isn't completed you just send him up with the count A had before the appeal.

AND the real order is still A, B, C, D, E etc. and you have to follow it next time through.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Wed Sep 29, 2010, 01:28am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Posts: 154
And in FED all outs stand (I get it!)

Last edited by BSUmp16; Wed Sep 29, 2010 at 01:29am. Reason: inside joke
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Batting Out of Order? Paul L Softball 3 Tue Mar 13, 2007 08:29am
ML Batting out of Order LeeBallanfant Baseball 11 Sat Jan 20, 2007 11:24am
Batting out of order Hoosier_Dave Softball 10 Fri Jul 14, 2006 03:28pm
batting out of order? fan Softball 22 Wed May 31, 2006 03:15pm
Batting out of order Roger Bridges Softball 2 Wed Dec 29, 2004 08:15pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:51am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1