The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 02, 2008, 08:31am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2
Catchers Interference

Greetings,
I have been lurking on this forum for awhile, and found the knowledge and assistance rendered here invaluable on many occasions. I have a question about catchers interference. I have been around baseball for a long time, and we all know that catchers interference is a rare occurrence, usually caused by an inexperienced catcher or one that sets up poorly.

A player (the batter) in a men's league is getting catchers interference calls regularly, almost in each game he participates in and sometimes two times in a game. The umpires are now aware of this, and regularly check to see if he is in the batters box. The catchers in these games are in a normal position, and since this is not called on any previous or subsequent batters the interference calls are an anomaly. In watching this particular hitter, he appears not to stride forward and actually seems to go back when he swings. Whether he is intentionally attempting to hit the catchers glove is not easily ascertained.

My question:
Is there are a rule (or interpretation of a rule) that takes care of this issue, and if not how would you guys approach this problem?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 02, 2008, 08:42am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
2008 BRD §269: Batter attempts to create catcher interference
Official Interp (Fitzpatrick): The batter may not deliberately attempt to create a catcher's interference call. Penalty: The ball is dead, strike, and runners do not advance. If the swing hits the catcher, the umpire shall eject the batter. No out is charged unless the batter has two strikes.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 02, 2008, 10:03am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron
2008 BRD §269: Batter attempts to create catcher interference
Official Interp (Fitzpatrick): The batter may not deliberately attempt to create a catcher's interference call. Penalty: The ball is dead, strike, and runners do not advance. If the swing hits the catcher, the umpire shall eject the batter. No out is charged unless the batter has two strikes.
Thank you. But what if his unorthodox swing simply takes him back into the catchers box? What are the parameters (if any) involving the batters swing (not his feet mind you) in regards to this?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 02, 2008, 11:03am
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
batter should change his unorthodox swing. one ejection and i'm sure it won't happened anymore. any swing worth a crap shouldn't have a hitter extending that far back in the swing.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 02, 2008, 11:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,219
Send a message via AIM to TussAgee11
I am not penalizing a batter for his unorthodox swing, unless he is INTENTIONALLY trying to create CI.

Its up to the catcher to not create INT, not the batter to have to avoid the catcher's glove in his swing.

I'd have to see his swing to see what exactly he was doing, but something REALLY funky would have to be going on for me to call a strike and eject instead of CI.

HTBT.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 04, 2008, 07:09am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Tuss has it right: you must judge that the INT is intentional before you call this. The interp actually has a note that you must be "certain," which seems to be a higher standard than most calls.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 04, 2008, 07:46am
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by TussAgee11
I am not penalizing a batter for his unorthodox swing, unless he is INTENTIONALLY trying to create CI.

Its up to the catcher to not create INT, not the batter to have to avoid the catcher's glove in his swing.

I'd have to see his swing to see what exactly he was doing, but something REALLY funky would have to be going on for me to call a strike and eject instead of CI.

HTBT.
Correct...but the player would argue that either way that his swing is "unorthodox" but whether or not a hitter's swing is as crappy as that, (assuming the swing really is that bad) he won't be playing much anyway.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bad Catchers radwaste50 Baseball 5 Mon Apr 17, 2006 01:39am
catchers interference rwrgrr Baseball 2 Tue Jul 20, 2004 01:44pm
Catchers Interference ??? Bandit Softball 7 Thu May 27, 2004 11:51am
Catchers Position Bandit Softball 9 Fri Nov 14, 2003 06:54pm
Catchers balk? chuckfan1 Baseball 20 Fri Jul 11, 2003 09:16am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:52am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1