The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 02, 2007, 08:49am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 362
Wild Pitch and Balk

Looking to get some assistance for another thread again.

Situation:R1 count of 2 -2. Balk is called on a wild pitch where R1 attempts to get to third base but is thrown out.

Discussion is about whether the balk is enforced since the BR did not reach first (pitch would be ignored and runner placed on 2nd) or is the balk ignored(count is now 3-2 and runner is out)

8.05 has two sections:
PENALTY: The ball is dead, and each runner shall advance one base without liability to be put out, unless the batter reaches first on a hit, an error, a base on balls, a hit batter, or otherwise, and all other runners advance at least one base, in which case the play proceeds without reference to the balk.

APPROVED RULING: In cases where a pitcher balks and throws wild, either to a base or to home plate, a runner or runners may advance beyond the base to which he is entitled at his own risk.


The Penalty section clearly indicates that the balk should be enforced because the BR didn't reach first, however does the Approved Ruling superceed the Penalty section because of the wild pitch??
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 02, 2007, 09:02am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by tibear
Looking to get some assistance for another thread again.

Situation:R1 count of 2 -2. Balk is called on a wild pitch where R1 attempts to get to third base but is thrown out.

Discussion is about whether the balk is enforced since the BR did not reach first (pitch would be ignored and runner placed on 2nd) or is the balk ignored(count is now 3-2 and runner is out)

8.05 has two sections:
PENALTY: The ball is dead, and each runner shall advance one base without liability to be put out, unless the batter reaches first on a hit, an error, a base on balls, a hit batter, or otherwise, and all other runners advance at least one base, in which case the play proceeds without reference to the balk.

APPROVED RULING: In cases where a pitcher balks and throws wild, either to a base or to home plate, a runner or runners may advance beyond the base to which he is entitled at his own risk.


The Penalty section clearly indicates that the balk should be enforced because the BR didn't reach first, however does the Approved Ruling superceed the Penalty section because of the wild pitch??
The balk is *ignored* for the runner (since he advanced a base; thus the out stands), but *enforced* for the batter (the pitch is ignored and the batter remains with a 2-2 count)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 02, 2007, 09:04am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northern OH
Posts: 277
If it's Fed. it's a dead ball immediatel when the balk is called. r1 advances one base.
I'll take a stab at MLB, but this needs to be confirmed....
My understanding of MLB, it's a delayed call. r1 has option of attempting 3rd, if thrown out and batter did not advance, offense has option of accepting penalty with no put out.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 02, 2007, 09:40am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Mueller
If it's Fed. it's a dead ball immediatel when the balk is called. r1 advances one base.
I'll take a stab at MLB, but this needs to be confirmed....
My understanding of MLB, it's a delayed call. r1 has option of attempting 3rd, if thrown out and batter did not advance, offense has option of accepting penalty with no put out.
There is never an option on a balk.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 02, 2007, 10:59am
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
The hitter could swing at the pitch and get a hit though...
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 02, 2007, 11:31am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 362
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
The balk is *ignored* for the runner (since he advanced a base; thus the out stands), but *enforced* for the batter (the pitch is ignored and the batter remains with a 2-2 count)
So you're saying the balk is ignored AND enforced on the same play. That's got to be fun to explain to the coaches!!!

Just to reinforce:

Situation: R1 and R3. Wild pitch with balk call. R1 takes second and rounds thinking about stealing third. R1 notices that R3 had a brain fart and is still standing on third. R1 is then thrown out going back to second.

In this situation, because R3 never advanced a base, the balk is enforced. The ball is dead, R3 is awarded home and R1 is awarded second. Everyone is safe.

OR

Because it is a wild pitch, the Approved Ruling section kicks in and: Ball is dead, R3 is awarded home and because R1 had advanced past his awarded base the out stands.

Which result is correct??

Last edited by tibear; Fri Feb 02, 2007 at 11:33am.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 02, 2007, 11:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
Quote:
Originally Posted by tibear
So you're saying the balk is ignored AND enforced on the same play. That's got to be fun to explain to the coaches!!!
STOP! You will get into trouble if you explain it that way!

In your first scenario, you started with R1, correct? If there is a balk, R1 is Protected only to second base. If R1 goes beyond second, he is on his own.

Now, if you explain it that way to a coach, he will understand you. More importantly, if you remember it that way, you will apply the rule correctly in any situation! Simply remember where the runner started and how far he is protected. The rest is academic.
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 02, 2007, 12:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 362
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzy6900
STOP! You will get into trouble if you explain it that way!

In your first scenario, you started with R1, correct? If there is a balk, R1 is Protected only to second base. If R1 goes beyond second, he is on his own.

Now, if you explain it that way to a coach, he will understand you. More importantly, if you remember it that way, you will apply the rule correctly in any situation! Simply remember where the runner started and how far he is protected. The rest is academic.
So infact your inforcing the balk for both runner AND batter but indicating the dead ball situation doesn't apply until the play is dead. Since R1 choose to proceed past his awarded base he is out.

What about the second situation that I presented with R1 and R3??

If I was to take a stab using the original situation as a basis: R3 is awarded home and R1 is out because he proceed past his awarded base.

Last edited by tibear; Fri Feb 02, 2007 at 12:02pm.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 02, 2007, 01:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern California
Posts: 396
At his own Risk!

If you use the term "At his own risk" you will becovered and potentially never forget the rule.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 02, 2007, 02:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 477
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyg08
The hitter could swing at the pitch and get a hit though...
And if he does the balk is ignored (OBR).
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 02, 2007, 02:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,577
You know, if yall would just drink the FED Kool-Aid, you could avoid all these nasty complications
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 02, 2007, 02:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,577
Quote:
Originally Posted by tibear
In this situation, because R3 and the BR never advanced a base, the balk is enforced. The ball is dead, R3 is awarded home and R1 is awarded second. Everyone is safe.
.................
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Balk/Illegal Pitch??? BoBo Softball 33 Mon Apr 24, 2006 12:57pm
IP goes wild (ISF) rayskie Softball 4 Sat Aug 21, 2004 08:51am
Balk with a pitch aepitaz Baseball 2 Tue Jun 08, 2004 06:43am
BALK OR ILLEGAL PITCH barisadlertx Baseball 15 Fri Mar 07, 2003 02:04pm
Balk or Illegal Pitch abergman Baseball 27 Wed Jun 06, 2001 11:04am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:18am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1