OBS effect

[teebob21]

Here's my $0.02: It depends on how many outs there are.

In a 2 out situation, the "out" on the obstructed runner would have meant that the runner would not have, in my judgment, scored had there been no obstruction. She goes back to 3B.

Otherwise, I grant the run per the logic of "she'd have scored had we not killed it due to OBS".

I haven't pulled every book yet, but I think this holds up in all the rulesets I work.

[teebob21]

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA

Where are you told to do that? Your answer will most likely be the rule being discussed and my argument is that you can TWP that rule in too many directions.

Side note/ double post: What is TWP?

[IRISHMAFIA]

Originally Posted by teebob21

Side note/ double post: What is TWP?

Third World Play

[CecilOne]

Originally Posted by teebob21

In a 2 out situation, the "out" on the obstructed runner would have meant that the runner would not have, in my judgment, scored had there been no obstruction.

If, ITUJ the run would have scored without the OBS; then because the "out" is presumably caused by the OBS, R1 would still score.