|
|||
Runner Lying on base
Situation: Men's ASA Slowpitch - R1 on 2nd, R2 on 1st - Batter hits ball into outfield, R2 is a much faster runner than R1 and is right behind R1 when approaching home plate. Ball gets to catcher but is up the 1st base line as R1 slides into home. R1 is on top of base, but there is some uncovered at the back corner. R2 steps on back of plate just before catcher jumps over R1 to make tag. R1 did nothing purposely to keep the catcher from reaching R2.
Is R2 safe or should interference be called on R1?
__________________
Travis ASA Umpire |
|
|||
Quote:
In reading your description, I would ask if F2 would have been able to reach and tag R2 before he touched the plate if R1 was not there. If the answer is yes, then an interference call is correct. If the answer to that question is no, then no interference call as there is not a play to be interfered with. You did say the throw was up the first base line, I'm envisioning that F2 had to take a few steps away from the plate to go get the ball and then had to move back to the plate to try to make a play. That leads me to think that there is not interference here.
__________________
It's what you learn after you think you know it all that's important! |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
There is potential for interference by a runner who scored. But it is too difficult to tell whether this would apply. We would need to know exactly where the runner was, what the catcher had to do, etc.
__________________
Kill the Clones. Let God sort them out. No one likes an OOJ (Over-officious jerk). Realistic officiating does the sport good. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. |
|
|||
What difference does it make if R2 has already touched the plate?
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Possibility of interference by runner who has scored. Keep reading.
__________________
Kill the Clones. Let God sort them out. No one likes an OOJ (Over-officious jerk). Realistic officiating does the sport good. |
|
|||
Quote:
R1 has scored. R2 has scored. Interference by which runner that has scored - and with what play?
__________________
Steve M |
|
|||
If I'm following this right, the question is, "did r1 interfere f2's play on r2"?
|
|
|||
That's how I read it, also. I also read that R2 touched the plate prior to the catcher starting to go over R1. So, IMJ, even if you consider R1 to being a hinderance or impediment (which I would not) to F2, R2 had scored by the time that impediment became a factor in the attempted play.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
base runner | rails42 | Baseball | 12 | Mon Mar 14, 2011 08:32am |
Yellow Card For Lying | jmaellis | Volleyball | 8 | Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:46am |
10U Runner on Third Base | Four Seam | Softball | 5 | Thu Apr 19, 2007 05:23pm |
And I thought the coaches on this board were lying | Jake80 | Basketball | 26 | Tue Apr 05, 2005 09:23pm |
Two Runner on One Base | nickdangerME | Softball | 5 | Tue Jul 09, 2002 06:28am |