The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 13, 2011, 05:06pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 9
base runner

If a runner intentionally interfers with a throw is that interference and a dead ball or is the runner out and the ball is live.Rule 8-4-2g does not explain
the penalty for it
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 13, 2011, 05:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Cool

rails,

If a runner intentionally interferes with a thrown ball, that is interference and a dead ball (immediate). See 5-1-1e.

Rule 5 is one of the most important - and oft-overlooked - rules in the FED rulebook.

JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 13, 2011, 07:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
Rails,

The Dead Ball and delayed dead ball table in Rule 5 is a real handy tool to remember because, it ties in the penalties to just about every rule in the book. That and the awards table in 8 are very handy.

Good luck
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 13, 2011, 07:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Northwest suburbs of Chicago
Posts: 645
This may be stating the obvious but...if the runner interferes it doesn't matter if it was intentional or not - the penalty applies, right? Batter interference usually involves a delayed dead ball.

At any of my clinics I preach to use the Casebook. It contains examples of what you look for and some pretty crazy plays that caused rule changes or points of emphasis. Check them out and I bet you'll find what you need.

Have a great season!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 13, 2011, 07:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 1,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeStrybel View Post
This may be stating the obvious but...if the runner interferes it doesn't matter if it was intentional or not - the penalty applies, right?
Interference with a thrown ball must be intentional.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 13, 2011, 08:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 9
Thank all of you for your answers
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 13, 2011, 08:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
Quote:
Originally Posted by dash_riprock View Post
Interference with a thrown ball must be intentional.
Agree, however on a force play slide, a runner more than half way to second that gets hit with a throw, commits unintentional interference.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 13, 2011, 08:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by jicecone View Post
Agree, however on a force play slide, a runner more than half way to second that gets hit with a throw, commits unintentional interference.
jicecone,

Are you sure?

While I'm familiar with the official interp that says he's not guilty if he's less than halfway, I'm not so sure the converse applies.

Let me know how that goes the next time you call it.

JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 13, 2011, 08:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
Quote:
Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM) View Post
jicecone,

Are you sure?

JM
The implication is certainly there from the interpretation but, I do agree that you may also have to get ready to throw out the Coach after you call the two outs.

Never had to call it and your right, probably wouldn't.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 13, 2011, 08:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Thumbs up

jicecone,

Me neither.

There was another thread on the question awhile back, and I believe it was Bob Jenkins who suggested he wouldn't hold the runner liable until he was close enough to 2B that he would reasonably be expected to initiate his slide.

That made a lot of sense to me.

JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 14, 2011, 08:12am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
Quote:
Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM) View Post
jicecone,

Me neither.

There was another thread on the question awhile back, and I believe it was Bob Jenkins who suggested he wouldn't hold the runner liable until he was close enough to 2B that he would reasonably be expected to initiate his slide.

That made a lot of sense to me.

JM
FYI

Interesting TidBit; I was looking a a new book I just purchased, "Plays that Trip you Up", by Stearn and Moore and they have a Case Play about this, where the runner gets hit at the "halfway" point to second. In Fed the play stands and in NCAA R1 is out.

Kind of like working with the gov't. Everyone has a opinion but, No One wants to make a decision. Then when we try to enforce ambiguity, we look like the beast we three heads,

Have a good day.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 14, 2011, 08:22am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,131
Quote:
Originally Posted by jicecone View Post
FYI

Interesting TidBit; I was looking a a new book I just purchased, "Plays that Trip you Up", by Stearn and Moore and they have a Case Play about this, where the runner gets hit at the "halfway" point to second. In Fed the play stands and in NCAA R1 is out.

Kind of like working with the gov't. Everyone has a opinion but, No One wants to make a decision. Then when we try to enforce ambiguity, we look like the beast we three heads,

Have a good day.
Interesting. What references do they give? I'd have the same ruling in both codes on these types of plays.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 14, 2011, 08:32am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
Interesting. What references do they give? I'd have the same ruling in both codes on these types of plays.
No references?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
10U Runner on Third Base Four Seam Softball 5 Thu Apr 19, 2007 05:23pm
Runner On Base Love this Game Softball 11 Tue Aug 16, 2005 11:21pm
Runner On Base mrm21711 Softball 6 Mon Mar 21, 2005 09:03am
Runner on base out when hit? emaxos Baseball 39 Wed Jun 30, 2004 01:24am
Two Runner on One Base nickdangerME Softball 5 Tue Jul 09, 2002 06:28am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:38am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1