Quote:
Originally Posted by HugoTafurst
If I'm following this right, the question is, "did r1 interfere f2's play on r2"?
|
That's how I read it, also. I also read that R2 touched the plate prior to the catcher starting to go over R1. So, IMJ, even if you consider R1 to being a hinderance or impediment (which I would not) to F2, R2 had scored by the time that impediment became a factor in the attempted play.