The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 29, 2011, 05:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 47
Another OBS question

Batter hits ball to outfield and the ball rolls all the way to the fence. Batter hits first and while half way to second base, gets tripped up by the 2nd baseman. At this point I singnal Delayed Dead Ball due to the OBS. Runner makes it 2nd base with no problem and stops there. Now, if I feel that the runner would have easily made 3rd base, but stopped at 2nd base due to the OBS, the rule dictates I award the runner 3rd base, even if there was never a play made on the runner. Correct?

This is ASA rules.

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 29, 2011, 07:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 241
I wouldn't. She stopped at second. I can't judge her intent to go to third had there been no obs. Second is where she stopped, second is where she stays.
__________________
ASA, NCAA, PONY, USSSA Fastpitch, NYSSO Umpire


As umpires, we are expected to be perfect our first game and get better every time out thereafter.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 29, 2011, 08:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 994
My understanding is that the runner is award the base the umpire believes she would have achieved if there had been no obstructions. Do you think she would have stopped at second if there had been no obstruction?
__________________
Dan
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 29, 2011, 09:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 47
I guess I should have been more clear - she did stop @ second because of the obstruction slowing here down. Had there been no obstruction, she would have went to 3rd.

How do I know that? Because of my ability to read minds
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 29, 2011, 09:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave9819 View Post
I guess I should have been more clear - she did stop @ second because of the obstruction slowing here down. Had there been no obstruction, she would have went to 3rd.

How do I know that? Because of my ability to read minds
You keep answering your own question. You award the OBS runner and any other runners affected by the OBS, the base you believe they would have made had the OBS not occurred. If you believe she would have reached 3B safely, that should be your award. The fact that she stopped at 2B is irrelevant.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 29, 2011, 10:56pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by LIBlueASA View Post
I wouldn't. She stopped at second. I can't judge her intent to go to third had there been no obs. Second is where she stopped, second is where she stays.
Her intent to stop or advance is irrelevant. If the umpire judges this to be a triple without the OBS, the award should be 3B, whether the runner attempts 3rd, stops at 2nd, or retreats to 1st. And, why she did any of those is irrelevant to the award.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 30, 2011, 11:13am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 241
I read the post wrong....I didn't read those words "all the way to the fence". I thought it was a simple base hit.

If this was the case, what was your question? It's in your judgment. Award bases you think would have been reached had there been no obstruction.
__________________
ASA, NCAA, PONY, USSSA Fastpitch, NYSSO Umpire


As umpires, we are expected to be perfect our first game and get better every time out thereafter.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 30, 2011, 06:50pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by LIBlueASA View Post
I read the post wrong....I didn't read those words "all the way to the fence". I thought it was a simple base hit.

If this was the case, what was your question? It's in your judgment. Award bases you think would have been reached had there been no obstruction.
And I believe that would be a fact in ANY case of OBS.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 01, 2011, 09:07am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 19
Ok I'm not a NCAA guy so lets use NCAA rule set

Same situation BUT runner RETURNS to first base after collision. Do you give her 2nd or since she returned to 1st is she only protected to the base she was headed to?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 01, 2011, 05:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodstock, GA; Atlanta area
Posts: 2,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inthegame View Post
Ok I'm not a NCAA guy so lets use NCAA rule set

Same situation BUT runner RETURNS to first base after collision. Do you give her 2nd or since she returned to 1st is she only protected to the base she was headed to?
Same answer, same result. Award the base the umpire judges would have been reached if there was no obstruction. Totally irrespective and regardless (but NOT irregardless) what base the runner attempts UNLESS the runner attempts a base beyond BOTH the base you judge she would have reached AND between the two bases she is obstructed.
__________________
Steve
ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 02, 2011, 07:46am
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 391
In a court of law, there are varying levels of burden of proof. In civil cases, it's "preponderance of evidence." In criminal cases, the standard is the more stringent "beyond a reasonable doubt."

What level of proof do you seek when awarding bases? Do you have to know with absolute certainty they would have reached a base to award it? Do you have to be pretty sure? What if you feel they almost without a doubt would have made a base, however a perfect throw and a perfect relay might possibly have cut down a runner trying to advance had their been no obstruction?

I'm curious what burden of proof other umpires use when determining awards. For me, I'm giving any benefit of the doubt to the offense since the defense is in the wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 02, 2011, 08:41am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
As Steve said "Award the base the umpire judges would have been reached if there was no obstruction", the rule is would not could and judgement not proof. If ITUJ, the runner might not have reached, that base should not be awarded, benefit of the doubt or not.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 02, 2011, 08:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by RadioBlue View Post
...What level of proof do you seek when awarding bases?...
No proof; there is no alternate universe to run the play without the OBS. Judgment is not the same as proof.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 02, 2011, 09:35am
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 391
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota View Post
No proof; there is no alternate universe to run the play without the OBS. Judgment is not the same as proof.
I understand what you are saying, Dakota. I agree that judgment and proof are not the same thing. Perhaps I should have used the word "evidence" instead of proof.

Let me offer this: In a situation where the award could be 3B or 2B, what evidence do require before you'll award 3B? Do you have to be 100% certain they would have made 3B, or just mostly certain to make that award?
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 02, 2011, 09:49am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by RadioBlue View Post
In a court of law, there are varying levels of burden of proof. In civil cases, it's "preponderance of evidence." In criminal cases, the standard is the more stringent "beyond a reasonable doubt."

What level of proof do you seek when awarding bases?
This question right here is one of my main pet peeves when discussing obstruction around the umpiring room. You require NO PROOF.

Dave said in the OP that he signalled DDB. He should also ... at THAT moment ... made a determination as to where the runner would have gotten to. The runner doesn't need to prove anything - she's been obstructed and her actions now are completely different than they would have been had she not been obstructed. It is OUR JOB to rectify the situation and place the runner where WE feel she would have gotten absent the obstruction. There are no further requirements on the runner (other than running the bases properly, I suppose ... like not passing other runners, etc.)
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A question on a play and a mechanics question. aevans410 Baseball 11 Mon May 12, 2008 09:23am
two questions - start of half question and free throw question hoopguy Basketball 6 Wed Mar 28, 2007 11:12pm
Rule Question and Mechanics Question Stair-Climber Softball 15 Fri May 06, 2005 06:44am
Over the back Question? Sorry mistyped my first question CoaachJF Basketball 15 Thu Feb 27, 2003 03:18pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:50am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1