The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 19, 2009, 03:55pm
#13 #13 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 12
Level of Play vs Level of Pay

In my current area, you get mileage for NCAA D1 and a set game fee for D2, D3. In NFHS, we have a higher game fee for Varsity vs. JV or Middle School. When it comes to ASA, whether you call Men's FP or a 10 year old Youth game, it is the same fee, which is less than 1/2 of a NFHS Varsity game.

I don't call strictly for the money (but it is nice at the higher levels). I work from home and it gives me a chance to get outside, get some exercise and I enjoy seeing the Youth go from level to level not too mention establishing relationships with the other folks in Blue. I have a great time out there, keep communication at a high level, seldom have any sportsmanlike problems and being a people person always is a plus to help out with coaches and game management.

My question is, why doesn't ASA pay different for different levels? Maybe it does in some other areas? The ASA booking agent in my area stated to tell him what our availability was on the calendar and what level we will or will not call. Given the same game fee for all levels, my response was I will call Youth only and a max of two days per week. I have seen the Mens FP and it certainly should have a higher game fee. It is much more intense than the biggest NFHS rival games, a higher level of ball and not too mention, we all know those folks like to let you know their opinions loud and clear no matter how stellar your positioning & judgment.

Anyone else ever felt this way?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 19, 2009, 05:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
ASA does not pay for games, the host does. ASA Code only sets minimums.

I have found that the higher level of play, the easier it is to umpire the game. But then again, I also give the same effort for a local league game that I do a national.

I do not change the game I offer based upon the level of play or pay. I would like to think that no good umpire would.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 19, 2009, 06:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodstock, GA; Atlanta area
Posts: 2,822
I guess it is a matter of opinion. My association has a price for all youth fastpitch, a different price for youth slowpitch, a third price for adult slowpitch, and a fourth price for adult fastpitch. However, every level and age of each category pays the same, and I expect (and require) that all umpires able to work any category be willing to call at all levels and ages I rate them as capable of calling.

This is part of the mentor and training relationship that we use so that every game has a senior official. Even in-park 10U requires an experienced official, and in order to provide training to newer umpires, the experienced umpires are expected to work the younger ages, too. If a senior umpire accepts 10U in-park to help the cause, it would be a double whammy to also pay him less than the 18 Gold he believes he should have that night; so we don't.
__________________
Steve
ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 19, 2009, 08:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 105
Pay and the rates that are applied seems to always be a floating target.
It usually depends on local, who gets the contract (assignor or an association), is part of what you get paid less an assigning fee.

Tournament pay also seems to differ than regular leagues.

Youth leagues are typically less than high school, and college is usually the best paid per game fees. College you do not do the volume of games that you do for your local youth or adult leagues.

There are lots of variables to the pay rate and how they are applied.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 19, 2009, 09:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sierra Nevada Mtns
Posts: 3,220
Mens ball does deserve more.. around here the games are longer 145 and we get more based on that, as we should. The problem is we got a JO raise and so far it hasnt caught up to the men yet so there isnt the difference there should be isnt much at this time. As was stated - ASA has no involvement in our contracts. Mens ball is a little different because there is some NAFA involvement as well... since it seems the Male FP leagues pretty much cant get far enough away from ASA...

We also have differences based on sp/fp and JO time limits <140 >140 or no timer. One man is not allowed in JO or mens FP but it is done in SP.
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS

Last edited by wadeintothem; Sun Apr 19, 2009 at 09:35pm.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 20, 2009, 04:55am
#13 #13 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 12
Thanks for the feedback folks. I always wondered about this.

Also, I totally agree w/IRISHMAFIA in that no good umpire would change their game based on the level of play.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
comfort level fullor30 Basketball 14 Thu Feb 26, 2009 05:43pm
New to ASA, rec level Owen Softball 10 Tue Jun 24, 2008 08:57am
Education level BLUENATION Basketball 22 Tue Mar 23, 2004 11:13pm
What level do you officiate at? ilya Basketball 2 Sat Nov 11, 2000 12:50am
MOVING UP TO NEXT LEVEL ARK ZEBRA Football 1 Thu Dec 30, 1999 04:29pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:43am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1