![]() |
|
|||
Are you asking me? Or turning it back to everyone else?
Everyone. At an ASA clinic in 2000 (before the throwing-the-bat-in-anger case play appeared), I was told that a deliberate crash, even if the fielder didn't have the ball, should result in an out and an ejection. When I pursued the matter as to where in the book it says to call an out, one of the clinicians replied, "It falls under interference. It's a form of interference." Later in the day, when I informed them that I had looked through "interference" and couldn't find it, they said, "It may not be there in black and white, but that's the interpretation." I didn't want to be remembered as the guy who wouldn't let an issue go, so I shut up about it after that. Then we had the case play that seemed to support such a call, but that has since been rescinded. This question and others like it appear so often that I wonder why the case book doesn't include a page or two of nothing but crashes of various kinds.
__________________
greymule More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men! Roll Tide! |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Crash interference | Dakota | Softball | 7 | Mon Jul 10, 2006 04:15pm |
What is a crash? | DaveASA/FED | Softball | 11 | Sun Jul 04, 2004 12:59am |
Crash? | TERRY1 | Softball | 5 | Thu Jun 13, 2002 01:45pm |
Crash Course Please? | Just Curious | Baseball | 1 | Thu Apr 11, 2002 10:28am |
Crash Rule | LIBLUE | Softball | 22 | Mon Mar 04, 2002 09:38pm |