Quote:
|
Originally Posted by greymule
We recently discussed a play (from an old ASA test) in which the batter is called out for throwing his bat in anger before his fly ball goes over the fence. We noted that the case book does not contain that play, and that the interpretation has been discredited or rejected.
However, an outgrowth of that interpretation was that a runner who, before touching home plate, deliberately crashed the catcher while the ball was still in the outfield could be called out for doing so, the run being nullified. The idea was that if a batter could be called out for "flagrant misconduct," so could a runner.
I taught that interpretation in a couple of clinics. However, I'm wondering whether now the call should be score the run and then eject the runner.
The Phelps-Johjima crash in yesterday's Yankees-Mariners game caused me to reconsider this. Note that in the MLB game, Phelps wasn't even ejected after an obviously intentional and unnecessary crash of a catcher who did not have the ball. Of course, retaliation followed from the mound.
|
We recently discussed a play (from an old ASA test) in which the batter is called out for throwing his bat in anger before his fly ball goes over the fence. We noted that the case book does not contain that play, and that the interpretation has been discredited or rejected.
Discredited or rejected by whom?
The case book is still valid in my opionion, since it was a 2005/06 book.
Does the current case book say to disregard previous interpretations?
Common sense says a player who commits an ejectable offense before scoring is out and his run(even on an awarded base) cannot count.