![]() |
|
|
|||
Because he apparently made a mistake in identifying a lineman as an eligible receiver.....
I also saw a clip of the touchdown pass that won the game. It looks like a receiver was covered up and advance down field at the snap. |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Agreed...... many times this is a crew call.
|
|
|||
Even worse, the play before the IG was another badly missed call by this crew.
I just watched the video of the second half. and this crew missed an illegal participation, or illegal substitution penalty on the previous play. One the play prior to the missed IG call, a BBR player hobbled off the field and a replacement came on right before the ball is snapped. The problem is that meant 12 players were on the field, and all participated in the play. Here is another question. When a player comes off the bench in high school, do they have to come inside the 9 yard marks prior to lining up in position on the play. The player who comes off the bench (12th player), only gets about 5 yards into the field and takes a position as a WR on the LOS. That meant 5 guys in the backfield, and 7 on the LOS. The linesman on the near side was already walking down field when the snap occurred. |
|
|||
Quote:
Does NFHS still have the 9 yard mark rule that was put into effect in 2005? IIRC the rule required all offensive players to be momentarily inside the 9 yard mark between the RFP and the snap. This would be designed to prevent exactly what happened on the play. An offensive player enters the field and is uncovered by a defensive player, and thus influences the play. The player that came onto the field, went deep and drew coverage from a defensive back which allowed another receiver to cut underneath catch the ball and get OOB to stop the clock. The biggest issue was still the missed 12 men on the field on that play anyway. Last edited by chapmaja; Mon Sep 23, 2013 at 07:59am. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
||||
Quote:
Now, yes, there still is a requirement to get inside the 9s. It isn't always strictly enforced, especially if the player is covered, but it seems like he wasn't here, so they may have missed one.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
The most important thing would be to get the call correct. I can't see any way they missed this call when no eligible number is within 25 yards of the play. I can see the referee just seeing a 6 or 1 on the player closest to the landing point, but 2 officials both looking at the area should be able to see no eligible player was in the area, thus the flag should have been thrown.
|
|
|||
I would agree. It looks like the referee immediately points to #61 being in the area. The problem is #61 is not, and if I understand the rules correctly can NEVER be an eligible receiver.
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rules question | gobuxx69 | Football | 26 | Sat Dec 22, 2012 12:20am |
question about some rules! | Sooner5900 | Basketball | 2 | Sun Dec 20, 2009 09:11am |
Rules Question | RANCHMAN | Basketball | 15 | Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:59am |
rules question | devdog69 | Basketball | 3 | Sun Jan 23, 2005 04:10pm |
Rules question #3...please help.... | trippingants4134 | Basketball | 11 | Tue Feb 26, 2002 11:56pm |