![]() |
|
|
|||
Starting to wonder if you even watch football. Thanks for quoting the same rule 3 times now. NO ONE requires WR's arms, head, hands to be completely still. By interpretation, not in "motion" is not the same as "motionless". No one is going to flag a receiver who turns his head to look at the official to make sure he's where he's supposed to be. No one is going to flag a QB for standing upright, signaling to someone, getting right back under center and snapping the ball.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
BigJohn:
The phrase "remain stationary...for at least one second before the snap" does NOT mean that further motion after the stop is prohibited -- in fact, it's quite common to have a player go in motion after the stop. |
|
|||
Ohio State Rules Interpreter Bruce Mauer says.
Check Page 58, Rule 7-2-6: says "without movement of hands". I would probably warn them the first time, then penalize them afterwards, unless they simulated the snap or drew B to encroach. I do not know if I have ever seen that type of mvt with receivers before. The key is they can do it initially, but must remain "without movement" for 1 sec before the snap. Bruce then after I pointed out that all had been stationary for 1 second he replied this: Legal play as long as they all set for 1 second without mvt prior to the snap. Bruce So there is the answer in Ohio.
__________________
When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my azz! Bobby Knight Last edited by bigjohn; Tue Sep 11, 2012 at 01:39pm. |
|
|||
And everywhere else. As everyone but you has been saying.
|
|
|||
Quote:
When you read the rule, you insert "immediately" into the phrase "prior to the snap." The rule is not remain stationary for at least one second immediately prior to the snap. |
|
|||
Quote:
Sometimes it is good to talk these things out so when you are faced with these situations or you make this call, what the potential reaction will be. If officials think this is silly to call, what do you think a coach is going to say? And for the record I disagree big time with our head clinician on this and he would have to tell us we should have called this to buy his position on this topic. ![]() Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
I'm fine with this discussion continuing but please let's ensure we maintain our decorum.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is "the patient whistle" and "possession consequence" ruining the game? | fiasco | Basketball | 46 | Fri Dec 02, 2011 08:43am |
Officiating "traveling" | Huntin' Ref | Basketball | 4 | Mon Jan 26, 2009 08:09pm |
ABC's "Nightline" examines "worst calls ever" tonight | pizanno | Basketball | 27 | Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:08am |
What is with the Fair Catch "Signal" ? | jimpiano | Football | 7 | Thu Oct 25, 2007 01:18pm |
New "Team Control" Signal | budjones05 | Basketball | 38 | Thu Jan 11, 2007 03:42pm |