|
Fri Sep 07, 2012, 03:10pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
The rule is cut and dried. Common sense says it should not be officated that way. I have never said it should. There is a difference in movement that is common to the game of football and movements that are not. That in my judgement is the distinction, and the way the rulesmakers want the games officiated. In my opinion, recievers that are making "traveling" signals are not making movements common to the game of football. I would flag this movement. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on this one, and it's obvious there are people on both sides of this discussion.
__________________
I'm due to make a great call. After all, I've been officiating a long time !!! 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is "the patient whistle" and "possession consequence" ruining the game? | fiasco | Basketball | 46 | Fri Dec 02, 2011 08:43am |
| Officiating "traveling" | Huntin' Ref | Basketball | 4 | Mon Jan 26, 2009 08:09pm |
| ABC's "Nightline" examines "worst calls ever" tonight | pizanno | Basketball | 27 | Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:08am |
| What is with the Fair Catch "Signal" ? | jimpiano | Football | 7 | Thu Oct 25, 2007 01:18pm |
| New "Team Control" Signal | budjones05 | Basketball | 38 | Thu Jan 11, 2007 03:42pm |
Threaded Mode
