|
|||
d pass interferance during punt
a friend told me he was watching an NFL game where dpi was called when the offense was in punt formation. the flag was waved off. the reason was there cannot be dpi when the offense is in punt formation. I am not familiar with pro rules. help please!
|
|
|||
The defense can block during a punt legally. When they see the punt formation they have no idea that the ball wasn't punted when they see the ball in the air downfield as they were playing as if it was punted so they can't be a fault.
NCAA is similar but it takes more than just being in a punt formation. For NCAA they would have to "simulate" the ball was punted by throwing the ball "high and deep" for there to not be defensive pass interference. |
|
|||
That isn't exactly true but many actions which would be pass interference during a normal down wouldn't be a foul because of the punt formation. The NCAA also has a similar rule.
Whenever a team presents an apparent punting formation, defensive acts that normally constitute pass interference are permitted against the end man on the line of scrimmage, or against an eligible receiver behind the line of scrimmage who is aligned or in motion more than one yard outside the end man on the line, provided that the acts do not constitute illegal holding. Defensive holding, such as tackling a receiver, still can be called and result in a five-yard penalty from the previous spot, if accepted. Offensive pass interference rules still apply. |
|
|||
To my knowledge there isn't any such rule in NFHS. Can anyone confirm or deny this?
Reason I ask is we had this exact situation during a game this year. Punt formation, ball snapped to punter(happened to be qb as well) who threw ball up down the sideline. Ball fell incomplete oob, but there was the possibility that dpi could have been called. Back Judge and HL who had angles on the play chose not to flag it. Like I said though I was curious if I've missed a case book play or rule that pertains to this situation. |
|
|||
There isn't such a rule in NFHS.
I've seen teams try it (line up in a scrimmage kick formation and throw it high and deep to simulate the punt) but they've not been successful in drawing the DPI the times its been tried. |
|
|||
I agree. I had one team try this (coach told us about it before the game and gave me a heads up before the play) but there wasn't contact on the eligible reciever. The coach went nuts telling me he told us about the play. I explained there still has to be contact. As usual I prefer the NCAA rule.
|
|
|||
Under the NFHS code, "faceguarding" would still apply, but in this type situation it would likely need to be VERY obvious.
|
|
|||
Quote:
This type of play was one of the reasons behind the rule change 10, or so, years ago where the pass had to be thrown in the direction of the receiver who is interfered with. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NFHS punt to pass question | voiceoflg | Football | 4 | Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:50pm |
Incomplete pass following muffed punt? | breynolds | Football | 9 | Fri Nov 30, 2007 09:00pm |
Blocked punt recovered, pass thrown! | w_sohl | Football | 0 | Tue Sep 27, 2005 07:59am |
Does pass interferance really apply? | kbarnett | Football | 9 | Fri Oct 29, 2004 05:18pm |
interferance | jumpmaster | Baseball | 3 | Thu Apr 18, 2002 01:01pm |